- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Republican Super PAC gets FEC go-ahead
Backer: Donation limits don’t apply
Question of the Day
The new Republican Super PAC got the green light from the Federal Election Commission on Thursday to skirt federal campaign-finance limits and to raise more money than ever before for the Republican presidential nominee and other party candidates.
“Its a victory because what we set out to do was to allow candidates and political-party leaders - in their official capacities as local, state or federal political party officials - to solicit funds for the Republican Super PAC,” RNC member James Bopp Jr. told The Washington Times. “The FEC in its 6-0 advisory opinion approved our goal.”
Some liberals didn’t see it that way. They greeted the FEC action as a defeat for the new money-raising device and a victory for campaign-finance regulation.
Democracy 21 President Fred Wertheimer said the FEC advisory “should put an end to any talk of federal candidates and officeholders, and national party officials, soliciting unlimited contributions for Super PACs.”
Politico said the FEC “unanimously voted down a proposal that would have further empowered the independent political groups vowing to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on hard-hitting campaign ads in the run-up to the 2012 election.” National Journal called the FEC decision “a setback for so-called ‘Super-PACs’ on both sides of the aisle that had hoped to harness the star power of popular politicians for financial gain.”
The basis of those reports was that FEC ruled, in response to a request by Democrat-led groups, that “covered individuals” - basically, lawmakers and party officials - could not personally solicit donations of more than $5,000 - the current limit on “hard money” contributions.
However, Mr. Bopp said, that’s a fairly meaningless and technical restriction that does not hamper anything his group wants to do. A person can still give as much as he wants, as long as the candidate doesn’t actually solicit amounts of more than $5,000.
“The only thing the FEC added that we did not propose is a meaningless requirement that candidates stipulate that they are not asking a person to give more than the federally set per-person $5,000 contribution limit and that the candidate is not soliciting unions or corporations.”
The role of a respected Republican candidate in soliciting contributions to the RSPAC is that in doing so, he raises the profile of - and lends authenticity to - the Super PAC, letting major donors know that it is the safe and right place to donate as much as they wish.
“I am very pleased that the FEC has made it clear that it is legal for candidates and political party officials, in their official capacity, can solicit contributions for Super PAC,” Mr. Bopp said. “Just a few weeks ago, the ‘reformers’ were screaming that such solicitations were illegal, and you go to jail. The first draft of the FEC advisory opinion also said it was illegal.”
He noted that such a disclaimer would not legally limit what a donor can give a Super PAC.
“I guarantee you that the donor will know that he can give all he wants as a result of the candidate’s solicitation,” he added. “I endorsed this result in comments to the FEC on Wednesday. This enables the Republican Super PAC to do exactly what it wants to do.”
Republicans saw the FEC action was a setback for President Obama and Democrats in general and a victory for Republican National Committee members Roger Villere of Louisiana, Mr. Bopp and Solomon Yue of Oregon.
The three men jointly founded the RSCAP as an independent expenditure “527” group that can raise unlimited sums to spend in advertising on behalf of candidates but without coordinating that spending with the candidates campaigns.
The purpose of the new RSPAC is to compete with the $1 billion in independent expenditures that President Obamas re-election drive is expected benefit from next year.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Chief political writer Ralph Z. Hallow served on the Chicago Tribune, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Washington Times editorial boards, was Ford Foundation Fellow in Urban Journalism at Northwestern University, resident at Columbia University Editorial-Page Editors Seminar and has filed from Berlin, Bonn, London, Paris, Geneva, Vienna, Amman, Beirut, Cairo, Damascus, Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Belgrade, Bucharest, Panama and Guatemala.
- GOP 2014: Oklahoma's Mary Fallin follows in her parents' footsteps
- GOP 2014: In New Mexico, Susana Martinez the hope for Hispanics
- GOP 2014: Thriving economy, school choice fuel Bobby Jindal agenda in Louisiana
- GOP 2014: Scott Walker survives, Wisconsin thrives
- GOP 2014: From House to Statehouse for Indiana's Mike Pence
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- DCCC raising money on suggestion Obama impeachment is imminent
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Pentagon running out of time to find mass of missing weapons in Afghanistan
- DeSean Jackson working on offensive cohesiveness with Redskins teammates
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq