EDITORIAL: Congress needs a chainsaw

Tiny cuts won’t prevent looming federal insolvency

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

House Republicans are expected to vote Tuesday on yet another short-term budget extension that nibbles away at the massive deficit. Senate Democrats and the White House have blasted as “irresponsible” the idea of reducing the amount of money government will borrow this year from $1.48 trillion to $1.42 trillion. So House Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, is taking a piecemeal approach that will end up reducing spending by the same amount.

The House voted Friday to eliminate the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s $1 billion “Emergency Homeowners Relief Program,” a useless boondoggle that costs taxpayers 98 cents on each dollar invested. On the previous day, the lower chamber sent the Senate a bill shutting down $8 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) spending. Tuesday’s vote would keep the government open until April 8 while making another $6 billion in noncontroversial cuts.

The largest chunk of savings would come from the elimination of $2.6 billion in previously approved earmarks. Another $1.74 billion rescission would come from 2010 census funding - hardly a daring move considering the census is already complete. The bill also trims $19.4 million in funding for tourism promotions in the national parks. It cuts $25.5 million in “global warming” programs so worthless that even the White House budget zeroed them out. Most of the other reductions come from the Senate Democrats’ list of obsolete programs that no longer need money.

On Friday, Mr. Obama drew a line in the sand to ensure the House majority doesn’t try to extend the cuts to any of the Democratic sacred cows. “My general view is, let’s not try to sneak political agendas into a budget debate,” he chirped. “I think one of the messages that the American people have clearly sent is get serious about living within our means and managing our budget in a responsible way, and stop with the political bickering.” Of course, for the president, “no bickering” means caving in to his demands and leaving alone the taxpayer money handed to National Public Radio and various union groups upon whom the Democrats depend for re-election support.

Focusing on the squabble over budgetary scraps overlooks the far more serious problem. The deficit for 2011 is expected to be $1.48 trillion. On Wednesday, after reviewing the the financial statements for the federal government, the Government Accountability Office stated, “The Financial Report, like the latest Congressional Budget Office long-term budget outlook and GAO simulations, shows that the federal government is on an unsustainable long-term fiscal path.”

It’s clear that splitting the difference between the parties, or even adopting the House funding proposal in full, wouldn’t come close to balancing the books. It’s also evident that Mr. Obama is not going to budge on an any issue that touches his political constituency - and the entitlements bestowed upon this dependent class are the root of our problems. It won’t be long before punting the hard choices down the road is no longer an option.

The easy, Democrat-approved cuts are going to dry up, and before long we will hit the debt ceiling. It’s difficult to see a resolution to the impasse that doesn’t involve shutting down the non-essential functions of government. To survive the president’s inevitable attack if this happens, the House majority will need to articulate how borrowing trillions from future generations to pay for yesterday’s spending is no longer acceptable. A shutdown would send the message that it’s time to get serious and go after the budget with a chainsaw, not fingernail clippers.

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts