- NASA pushing hard to get back into space game
- Harvard student to face federal charges for bomb hoax
- Ronnie Biggs of ‘Great Train Robbery’ fame dies, 84
- Pope Francis wins another ‘Person of the Year’ — from gay rights magazine
- Rep. Steve Stockman: Give my campaign $10, and you’ll get an Obama barf bag
- Putin: Russia to buy $15 billion in Ukraine bonds
- Expert: Obamacare ‘death spiral’ fears exaggerated
- Alabama firefighters dig for survivors of apartment blast
- Big Sur wildfire destroys home of firefighting chief
- ‘ ’Twas the Night Before Christmas’ set for mock trial to argue authorship
Petraeus: Enough progess made for Afghanistan withdrawal
The top U.S. military commander in Afghanistan told Congress Tuesday that his forces had made enough progress to justify starting a three-year withdrawal in July. But testimony from other officials made it clear that, even after 2014, U.S. troops will be in the country on an “enduring” basis.
“The momentum achieved by the Taliban in Afghanistan since 2005 has been arrested in much of the country and reversed in a number of important areas,” Army Gen. David H. Petraeus told the Senate Armed Services Committee.
“However, while the security progress achieved over the past year is significant, it is also fragile and reversible.”
The gains of the past year have “put us on the right azimuth to accomplish the objective agreed upon at last November’s Lisbon summit, that of Afghan forces in the lead throughout the country by the end of 2014,” he said.
But testimony from Pentagon policy chief Michelle Flournoy made it clear that not all U.S. troops will leave the country, even after the transition of control to Afghan Security Forces is complete.
“Our nation has made that mistake before, and we are determined not to repeat it,” she said, referring to the 1990s, when the United States, having helped Afghan insurgents defeat the Soviet occupation, abandoned the country to the bloody chaos that birthed the Taliban.
After 2014, “Afghans must stand in the lead, but they will not stand alone,” Ms. Flournoy said, adding that Mr. Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai were working out the details of an “enduring strategic partnership beyond 2014.”
Ms. Flournoy did not provide numbers, saying only that “some U.S. forces” would remain to train and assist Afghan police and military and conduct joint counterterrorism operations with them.
She said Mr. Karzai next week would publish a list of the districts and provinces that would be handed over to Afghan control in the first stage of the transition later this year.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
By John R. Bolton
The president fiddles at his domestic altar while the world burns
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- PRUDEN: The scam that will not die
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Top Democrats reject court ruling over NSA spying on Americans
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- White House is obstructing probe on Navy Yard shooter, NSA leaker, Darrell Issa says
- We told you so: Conservatives foresaw polygamy ruling
- Colorado revolt: 55 of 62 sheriffs refuse to enforce new gun laws
- Senators in rush to pass budget vow to undo cut to military retirement pay
- Embassy Row: India strikes back over diplomat's arrest
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow