- Sen. Harry Reid goes to hospital as a precaution
- Fla.’s Trey Radel exits rehab, ‘excited’ to resume congressional role
- U.S. nuclear general boozed it up, chased ‘hot women’ in Russia: report
- 45 Calif. students at one school test positive for tuberculosis exposure
- Rob Ford on women: Give them cash ‘and they are happy’
- Ku Klux Klan group holds recruitment meeting in Maryland
- Airport assassination: Mayor, 3 others killed at Manila airport
- Tea party-type lawmakers take mysterious, off-books trip to Mideast
- North Korea warns South: We’ll attack ‘without warning’
- Congress sends sweeping defense bill to Obama
Netanyahu heads to U.S. after border clashes
Question of the Day
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu travels to Washington this week as the Jewish state confronts new border clashes coinciding with the anniversary of the Palestinians’ defeat in the 1948 war and protests that some analysts say signals the start of another uprising, or intifada.
White House representatives condemned Syrian authorities on Monday for letting crowds approach the border with Israel, something Syria's government prevented in the past, while the Israeli Defense Forces were condemned in a statement from the United Nations for firing on the throngs of refugees who approached the border.
Israeli officials said the border incidents that have killed at least 15 people do not appear to be a third intifada, or Palestinian uprising. Some Arab nongovernmental organizations had announced plans to march on Syrian and Lebanese borders with Israel as the start of such an uprising.
“The Palestinians’ transition from terrorism and suicide bombings to deliberately unarmed mass demonstrations is a transition that will present us with difficult challenges,” said Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak.
Aaron David Miller, who has been a senior adviser on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to six secretaries of state, said Syrian orchestration has combined with increasing boldness by Palestinians who marched to the border.
“This does not suggest a fundamental change, though. This may be a new tactic, but it’s unlikely to morph into a new strategy,” Mr. Miller said.
“What could be a new phase is if Palestinians pressed the checkpoints every day in numbers of a far greater proportion,” he said. “This would confront the Israelis with a new challenge. Hamas has made a judgment that it is not interested in escalating now. But if you had a strategy of massive protests that would elicit a tough Israeli response, you could put the Israeli-Palestinian issue on the map in a new way. I am not recommending this, though.”
Israeli officials said in interviews that it was significant that no rockets were fired from Hamas-controlled Gaza on Sunday, a holiday for Arabs known as “nakba,” which marks the expulsion and flight of about 750,000 Palestinians after Arab armies failed to defeat the fledgling Israeli forces in 1948.
“We cannot rule out the possibility that this could lead to more violent demonstrations in the West Bank,” one Israeli said. “But the overall assessment at the moment is that Palestinians and residents of the West Bank will not want to jeopardize the economic prosperity achieved in the last few years.”
“Those individuals in Hamas who have expressed a wish for this to be a third intifada are engaging in demagoguery because a third intifada, if we are talking about the existing template, would mainly take place in the West Bank for which [Hamas members] are not responsible,” said Hussein Ibish, a senior research fellow at the American Task Force on Palestine.
Mr. Ibish added that “President Abbas was elected by a very large mandate in January 2005, running on a platform of nonviolence and was noted as a harsh critic of the violence of the second intifada on all sides.”
Mr. Netanyahu is set to meet with President Obama on Friday at the White House. It is the first face-to-face meeting for the two leaders since the collapse of Mr. Obama’s peace initiative, which linked Israeli construction in East Jerusalem to Palestinian participation in the peace process.
Mr. Netanyahu told the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, on Monday that he wants to make peace with a Palestinian state willing to end the conflict. “I am not willing to accept a Palestinian state that wants to continue it,” he said.
Those words are a direct reference to Hamas, the party in control of Gaza that recently reached a unity government agreement with Fatah, Mr. Abbas‘ party. Hamas has rejected all peace deals with Israel and quotes the anti-Semitic forgery “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” in its charter.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
By Michael P. Orsi
Edward Snowden should declare his patriotism in court
- Huge backlash mounts over suspension of 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson
- Citing 'unfair system,' Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Deportations under Obama plunged to just 1 percent last year
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Sebelius adds yet another exemption for Obamacare
- Special ops vets slam military benefit cuts
- EDITORIAL: Red faces at the White House
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- PRUDEN: 'Tis the season for apologies
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Southern Fried Politics from the Lens of a Persian-American Millennial
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow