KNIGHT: In Socialism We Trust?

Jerrold Nadler has a problem with God in America’s motto

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

In God We Trust” is the national motto, even though Barack Obama told a Jakarta, Indonesia, audience last November that our national motto is “E Pluribus Unum” ( “Out of many, one”).

At least President Obama got the translation right. Al Gore once said that it meant “Out of one, many.” Perhaps he was employing the same math formulas that work so well in his global-warming calculations.

But I digress. The real motto is, indeed, “In God We Trust,” and Congress re-emphasized this on Oct. 25, passing a resolution saying so in a 396-9 vote. Sponsored by Rep. J. Randy Forbes, Virginia Republican, the bill affirms the motto and “encourages its display in public buildings and government institutions.”

Mr. Forbes explained that the reminder was needed in light of Mr. Obama’s recasting of the motto and also because of the mysterious replacement of the motto at the National Capitol Visitors Center “with stars in a replica of the House Chamber - and cropping an actual picture of the chamber so you could not see the words ‘In God We Trust.’ “

The idea of affirming In God We Trust was too much for Jerrold Nadler, the New York liberal who represents ACORN in the House of Representatives and also the socialist Working Families Party and Occupy Wall Street.

“Here we are, back to irrelevant issue debates, the kind of thing people do when they have run out of ideas, when they have run out of excuses, when they have nothing to offer a middle class that is hurting and that has run out of patience,” Mr. Nadler said, explaining his vote against the resolution.

Mr. Nadler’s comments mirror those of Mr. Obama, who rebuked the House and delivered this non sequitur: “I trust in God, but God wants to see us help ourselves by putting people back to work.” Translation: God wants big government to get even bigger.

Jay Carney, Mr. Obama’s spokes-theologian, further mangled things by asserting, “I believe that the phrase from the Bible is ‘The Lord helps those who help themselves.’ ” Sorry, Jay, that phrase is not in the Bible, which the White House later admitted.

If you’re keeping score, besides Mr. Nadler, others voting against the resolution included Reps. Gary L. Ackerman, New York Democrat; Justin Amash, Michigan Republican; Judy Chu, California Democrat; Emanuel Cleaver, Missouri Democrat; Michael M. Honda, California Democrat; Henry C. “Hank” Johnson Jr., Georgia Democrat; Robert C. “Bobby” Scott, Virginia Democrat; and Fortney Pete Stark, California Democrat.

Reps. Keith Ellison, Minnesota Democrat, and Melvin L. Watt, North Carolina Democrat, voted “present.”

It’s not that Mr. Nadler opposes resolutions per se. He sponsored a resolution in 2009 commemorating the 40th anniversary of the drag-queen revolt known as the Stonewall riots. He also sponsored a resolution in 2009 condemning the murder of “pro-choice doctor” and “health care provider” George Tiller, the Wichita abortionist. Tiller, who was shot to death at his church, was the nation’s leading practitioner of the gruesome infanticide known as partial-birth abortion.

It’s good that Mr. Nadler is against people being shot, especially in church, but it’s curious that the Forbes resolution acknowledging America’s debt to God for our abundant blessings drives him crazy enough to take the floor to condemn it.

“This is simply an exercise in saying, ‘We’re more religious than the other people,’ ” Mr. Nadler nattered sarcastically. ” ‘We’re more godly than the other people, and by the way, let’s waste time and divert people’s attention from the real issues that we’re not dealing with,’ like unemployment.”

Well, OK. How about unemployment? Mr. Nadler reliably voted against the job-creation bills that the House passed in recent months, all of which were aborted in Harry Reid’s Senate upon delivery.

If we’re supposed to be addressing “real issues,” where is the evidence that in a time of massive unemployment and economic uncertainty, Americans are just itching to redefine marriage as two guys on a pink cake? Mr. Nadler is a chief sponsor of the bizarrely titled Respect for Marriage Act, which would dump a Capitol domeful of cowpies right on the institution of marriage, destroying its real meaning.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts