- Obama hosting annual Easter Egg Roll
- Big Bang a big question for most Americans: Poll
- Jimmy Carter’s grandson: People have right to sport Confederate battle flag license plate
- Supreme Court issues no ruling on case challenging N.J. gun law
- Sharyl Attkisson: Media Matters ‘clearly targeted me’
- Sherpas consider boycott after Everest avalanche
- Democrat Rep. Stephen Lynch on Obamacare: ‘We will lose seats’ this November
- Syria to hold presidential election on June 3
- People will be safe at 118th Boston Marathon, Mayor Marty Walsh says
- Boy Scout, 12, killed by rolling tree during troop outing at Washington park
Oil, gas exploration seen creating 1M jobs in seven years
Can cut U.S. debt, too, industry says
Taking the handcuffs off the oil and gas industry would put more than a million Americans to work in the next seven years and make an $800 billion dent in the national debt by 2030, according to a new study released Wednesday.
The report, compiled by the Scotland-based consulting firm Woods Mackenzie and funded by the American Petroleum Institute, was unveiled a day before President Obama outlines a long-awaited jobs proposal before a joint session of Congress on Thursday night.
While his proposal is likely to include an infrastructure bank and an extension of the payroll tax holiday, oil and gas companies hope the president will simply announce that he’s getting out of their way.
“All he has to do is say the word and I promise you this industry will immediately go to work,” said API President Jack Gerard, speaking at an Energy Jobs Summit hosted Wednesday by the Hill newspaper.
Mr. Gerard outlined steps that President Obama can take on his own, without waiting for energy legislation to work its way through a gridlocked Congress. They include: an expansion of offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico; opening up drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR); allowing companies to tap reserves in some sections of the Rocky Mountains; and embracing the vast natural gas deposits in the Marcellus Shale, which stretches from upstate New York as far south as Kentucky and contains trillions of cubic feet of natural gas.
Mr. Gerard also voiced support for the Keystone XL pipeline, a $7 billion project that would carry crude oil from Canada to states as far south as Texas.
If the API plan is adopted, the industry estimates that more than 1 million jobs would be created by 2018, and exceed 1.4 million by 2030. At least $36 billion in new tax revenue would funnel into the Treasury by 2015, and nearly $803 billion by 2030, according to the study.
The U.S. would also take a major step forward in its energy security. By 2030, the equivalent of 35.4 billion barrels of oil could be produced domestically, the report states.
“If the full potential of domestic oil and gas production could be achieved while also increasing imports of Canadian oil, all of America’s liquid fuels could come from secure North American sources within 15 years,” Mr. Gerard said.
But Mr. Obama, fresh from a decision to rescind unpopular ozone regulations, may be reluctant to give the oil and gas industry free rein in places like the ANWR, long held sacrosanct by environmentalists.
Many Democrats continue to tout wind and solar power as the nation’s energy future, while calling for an end to subsidies for oil companies. Environmental groups staunchly oppose offshore drilling and want stricter federal guidelines on “fracking,” the use of water, sand and chemicals to crack rock and extract gas from the Marcellus Shale.
With the two sides seemingly far apart, the nation continues to move forward without a coherent energy policy, said Sen. Ben Nelson, Nebraska Democrat, while speaking at the jobs summit.
Mr. Nelson said all types of energy — oil, natural gas, nuclear, wind and solar — must be a part of the mix. “To me, that’s what the administration can do. If you put together a plan at least you know where you are, what’s left out and where you need to go,” he said.
The oil and gas industry is also concerned that, with lawmakers searching for ways to reduce deficit spending, the industry will be singled out and tagged with additional taxes. If that happens, John Watson, CEO of Chevron, said companies would shy away from hiring more workers and would reduce investments they make in American energy production.
“We pay our fair share of taxes we just want to be treated fairly,” he said Wednesday.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- What will a grandchild mean for Hillary?
- What will a grandchild mean for Hillary Clinton?
- Obama to tour site of Washington mudslide
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
- Joe Biden's biggest gaffe: VP blowing his 2016 head start
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Twitter blocks accounts critical of Turkish government
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Jimmy Carter's grandson: People have right to sport Confederate battle flag license plate
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- CURL: Shelly O first lady Michelle Obama comes in last
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.