- Beretta leaves Maryland over gun laws, heads for Tennessee
- Neal Boortz defends Hillary Clinton for representing child rapist
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
EDITORIAL: The foreign-born candidate
FEC allows the ineligible to run for the nation’s highest office
Question of the Day
Can a foreign-born citizen run for president? The Federal Election Commission thinks so.
Earlier this month, commission members agreed that Abdul K. Hassan, a Guyana-born naturalized U.S. citizen, could qualify as a presidential candidate. In an advisory opinion, the commission concluded that Mr. Hassan may be considered a candidate and could solicit funds to support his campaign. However, he would be ineligible for federal matching funds.
The Constitution says that no person “except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.” Mr. Hassan freely admits that he does not meet this requirement. That doesn’t matter, according to the Federal Election Campaign Act, which defines a candidate as “an individual who seeks nomination for election, or election, to Federal office.” There is no question that Mr. Hassan is seeking election, even if he could not legally hold the office. A legitimate candidate must have received more than $5,000 in campaign contributions or made more than $5,000 in campaign expenditures. Mr. Hassan has yet to clear this bar, but if he does, his hat is formally in the ring.
The FEC withheld an official vote on the question pending the outcome of Mr. Hassan’s quixotic federal case seeking to overturn the natural-born-citizen requirement. He argues that this explicit constitutional restriction is itself unconstitutional. “Under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, race and national origin are the only two classifications that are subject to the highest level of judicial scrutiny (strict scrutiny),” he claims, “and almost every law (or probably every law) subject to strict scrutiny by the U.S. Supreme Court in the last 60 years has been declared invalid.” Mr. Hassan cites the 1964 Supreme Court case Schneider v. Rusk, which overturned part of the Immigration and Nationality Act because it gave disparate treatment to naturalized and native-born citizens. “This statute proceeds on the impermissible assumption that naturalized citizens as a class are less reliable and bear less allegiance to this country than do the native born,” Justice William O. Douglas wrote for the majority. “This is an assumption that is impossible for us to make.”
In other years, these type of crackpot efforts might go unnoticed, but Mr. Hassan’s presidential run draws the sort of attention that makes the Democratic National Committee rather uncomfortable. Earlier this year, prospective Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump brought mainstream attention to the question of the circumstances of Barack Obama’s birth. The White House responded by finally releasing a long-form birth certificate from Hawaii, which for the most part put the issue to rest. Yet if the FEC formally votes to allow Mr. Hassan to be a candidate under federal law, it will present an opportunity for state legislatures to revisit the ballot-access issue - something a dozen states have debated already. It’s the sort of distraction Mr. Obama’s campaign could do without.
For Mr. Hassan’s part, his campaign is focused on solving the government’s fiscal mess and saving “the American people from more tax increases, spending cuts and job losses.” He sounds presidential already.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Obamacare in intensive care
- EDITORIAL: Mr. Monkey's business in merry old England
- EDITORIAL: A new witch hunt in Salem
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Mexico's problem is poverty
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ready for a libertarian awakening
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The president could pay the full price for ignoring Congress
Get Breaking Alerts
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- BERMAN & MADYOON: An Iranian-Turkish reset
- MAY: Barbarians at Jordan's gate
- EDITORIAL: Obamacare in intensive care
- Pentagon team dispatched to Ukraine amid crisis with Russia
- Hamas terrorists wear Israeli army uniforms to ambush soldiers in Gaza