- Elton John blasts Russia’s anti-gay laws during Moscow concert
- U.N.: Afghanistan slow to enforce law protecting women
- Heart cancels SeaWorld concert after ‘Blackfish’ documentary
- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- South Africans hold day of prayer for Nelson Mandela
- Mandela not on life support in final hours, friend says
- Ukraine protesters topple, decapitate Lenin statue in Kiev
- Kim Jong-un’s uncle removed from North Korean state documentary
- Thailand crisis deepens as opposition quits Parliament
- Campbell Soup apologizes for SpaghettiOs’ Pearl Harbor tweet
Activists file challenge to get corporate political donations ban on D.C. ballot
A group of activists hoping to ban direct corporate contributions to D.C. political campaigns is challenging an Aug. 8 ruling by the city's Board of Elections in a last-ditch effort to put their initiative on the November ballot.
Members of the D.C. Public Trust said a pair of "line-by-line reviews of the board's work" show they gathered signatures from more than 24,500 registered voters — more than enough to put their issue before the voters. The board ruled petitioners had not gathered enough signatures.
Citing errors in the board's review, D.C. Public Trust filed a challenge in D.C. Superior Court on Monday.
"Our review finds that Initiative 70 clearly qualified for the ballot, and we expect the court will agree," said organizer Bryan Weaver, a Ward 1 resident.
The group's army of volunteers collected and submitted more than 30,000 signatures from across the city, but the elections board said just 21,572 — or 1,726 short of the minimum threshold — were valid.
The activists had 10 days to consider an appeal. They say their findings will turn the tide in their favor.
Among their claims, the group's court filing says the board invalidated signatures because the registered voter used a nickname instead of his or her full name. It also tossed signatures that had been collected at polling sites "moments after the individual had voted," court papers say.
In cases in which a person's name showed up twice on petition pages, they say the board invalided both signatures instead of counting one.
Using the election board's guidelines, the group said it "counted 24,645 duly registered voters identified by the Board — 1,346 more than the 23,299 [5 percent] required by law ... In addition, the review conducted by D.C. Public Trust identified more than 1,000 duly registered voters on petition sheets who had been improperly disqualified."
Technically, the group had until mid-September to gather more signatures under the 180-day circulation period. The extra time would allow them to qualify for a future special election if D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson wins the November election for chairman and permanently vacates the at-large seat he left when former council Chairman Kwame R. Brown resigned amid felony charges in June.
But regulations from the election board suggest the group will have to start from scratch. The relevant clause says: "Signatures submitted in support of a rejected initiative or referendum petition shall not be resubmitted for filing in order to qualify the measure for an election ballot."
The situation coincides with D.C. Mayor Vincent C. Gray's plans to roll out more nuanced legislation intended to curb pay-to-play politics in the city. Among its reforms, the legislation would require corporations that contribute to a candidate to identify all of their subsidiaries, affiliates and controlling shareholders.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Obama admin.: One in 10 Obamacare forms might have errors
- Obama administration knew of key Obamacare delay in August, emails say
- House Speaker John Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
- Young millennials shun Obamacare, creating risky imbalance
- Almost 1.5 million deemed eligible for Medicaid in October alone: Obama administration
Latest Blog Entries
- Calif.: Give 'gift of health' by pledging cash for the uninsured
- Tensions hit boiling point over Obamacare enrollment figures, error rates
- Young, uninsured adults vital to Obamacare are not keen on enrolling: New Harvard poll
- Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox will promote Obamacare at Mall of America
- HealthCare.gov employs a new look once again
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- CHELLANEY: China's game of chicken
- Sen. Rand Paul pushes 'economic freedom zones' for Detroit
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Russian lawmaker wants to outlaw U.S. dollar, calls it a Ponzi scheme
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- New Internet security challenge arises for cybercops
- Wife of Obama aide found dead in burning car in home's garage
- Congress creates a legislative fortress for military sex-assault policy
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Al Maurer provides a common sense, conservatarian, Constitutional conservative perspective from the battleground state of Colorado
Film Reviews and Articles by Kevin Williams
"Critical thinking is thinking about your thinking while you're thinking in order to make your thinking better." - Dr. Richard Paul
Go beyond tourism's "top 10" bus tour destinations with Susan McKee as she explores the varied history, culture, food, and gardens, of the world.
Let it snow
White House pets gone wild!