- GOP presses to scrap IRS commissioner position — but put in panel
- New bill would make sure women in military can get free birth control
- Trafficking bust reveals worries over missing kids; minors as young as 11 found
- Catholic League slams Obama: ‘Do Christian lives mean so little to you?’
- National laboratory cancels ‘Southern Accent Reduction’ classes after outcry
- U.S. woman with Ebola is stable, improving, son says
- Belgium pushes for clear labeling of goods from Israeli settlements
- ‘Queen of Mean’ Leona Helmsley’s former home hits market for $65M
- Florida beach-goers told to beware flesh-eating bacteria in water
- Lundergan Grimes uses ‘war on women’ strategy to attack McConnell
Some makers cringe to hear word ‘drone’
Question of the Day
LAS VEGAS — Unmanned aerial vehicles may be exploding in popularity, but among industry leaders, their common moniker — “drone” — is rapidly going out of style.
“People in the past thought of drones as stupid and unsophisticated,” said Michael Toscano, president and CEO of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, which this week is holding its annual convention in Las Vegas. “When we say unmanned system or unmanned vehicle, it gives the connotation that there’s more to it than just the piece that’s flying.”
To Mr. Toscano and others, that’s an important distinction. These days, drones are much more than glorified model airplanes. They carry out risky missions in the Middle East, assist law enforcement agencies in the field and are a part of other complex operations.
In the near future, drones will do much more. Currently available to only the military, police departments and government agencies, the crafts will be licensed for personal and commercial use beginning in 2015.
Regardless of how widely used they become, Mr. Toscano admits that the sector likely won’t be able to shake the name.
“Part of it is our fault. We don’t have one single terminology that we use. That adds to the confusion, but we tend to stay away from ‘drone,’” he said.
Webster’s Dictionary defines drone as “a pilot-less airplane, helicopter, or ship controlled by radio signals.” The term has become ingrained in the public lexicon, even if sector leaders don’t believe it paints a wholly accurate picture of what the crafts can do.
Changing the negative public perception of unmanned vehicles will happen only when people begin to see the positive things they can do, such as helping fight forest fires or search for missing children, Mr. Toscano said.
“At the end of the day, it’s going to be the actions, what these things do, that people understand,” he said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at email@example.com.
- White House: No choice but to act now on climate change
- EPA hears testimony on proposed carbon emissions rules
- Russia in violation of 1987 missile treaty, White House says
- In politics, all states are 'border' states
- Libya now nation at risk with weak U.S. influence; embassy closes as chaos grows
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
- Patent workers paid to exercise, shop, do chores: report
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Proving A Point: Redskins' Bacarri Rambo vows to make impact in second year
- Obama mum on where illegal immigrant children are sheltered
- National laboratory cancels 'Southern Accent Reduction' classes after outcry
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world