- Israel hits symbols of Hamas rule; scores killed
- Mississippi abortion law can’t be enforced
- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Middle Eastern firm’s deal to manage U.S. cargo port raises security concerns
- Bob McDonnell’s defense: Lonely wife developed ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House Republicans unveil bill to speed deportations of border children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
KNIGHT: The left’s ongoing assault on election integrity
Liberals are moving America toward one-party rule
Question of the Day
If you think the left is resting on its laurels after Barack Obama’s re-election and the Democrats’ retention of the U.S. Senate, think again.
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who halted photo ID laws in South Carolina and Texas before the November election, suggested on Tuesday in Boston that the United States should consider adopting “automatic” voter registration.
This essentially would mean that millions of people who sign up for government benefits but don’t bother to register to vote will be given the franchise. Think of it as Motor Voter on crack cocaine.
It’s the perfect way to grow Big Bird’s Food Stamp Army into an unstoppable force and move America toward the Chicago model of dependency and one-party rule.
Liberals also are talking about getting rid of the Electoral College, which would give vote fraudsters a huge incentive to stuff ballot boxes where their candidates were going to win anyway, such as deep-blue California, Illinois and New York.
Apart from their destruction of the Founders’ idea of self-government by an informed citizenry, “automatic” registration and direct popular vote would damage the states’ constitutionally appointed role of conducting elections. The automatic registry also smacks of authoritarianism.
If Obamacare’s individual mandate violates the Constitution (and it does), how about the government requiring automatic registration whether you want it or not? The logical follow-up is a future requirement to vote. That’s the case today in several nations, including Cuba and, more alarmingly, Germany.
Liberals have been successful in getting around voter-integrity safeguards because of collusion among outside groups, government officials and a compliant media. Last year, while Mr. Holder was invalidating voter ID laws, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a 54-page lawsuit against Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker over a photo ID statute. The law, which Mr. Walker signed in May 2011, was halted when two state courts issued permanent injunctions.
Following the script of race hustler Al Sharpton, who never saw a problem that couldn’t be turned into a circus of bigotry, the ACLU contends that requiring Wisconsin voters to present one of many photo IDs is the equivalent of a “poll tax.”
Nobody knows better how to turn hard cases into bad law, so the ACLU dug up 17 plaintiffs, including hapless students, homeless people and an 84-year-old legal citizen whose birth certificate is misspelled.
Another major concern is the expansion of early voting and absentee balloting without excuse, which a majority of states allow. In Colorado, 8 in 10 votes were cast before Election Day 2012. In Iowa, early voting began 40 days before Election Day, and 10 percent of the votes were cast in “satellite” voting places, which can be erected if petitioners turn in 100 names from any given county.
The booths can be as close as 300 feet to a campaign rally, which was convenient for Michelle Obama, who concluded her speech at the University of Northern Iowa in Cedar Falls on Sept. 28 by telling students to go vote, which many did on the spot.
Petitioners also can request certain hours of voting. A satellite booth was in operation from 6 p.m. to midnight at Iowa State on Oct. 18 when Bruce Springsteen gave a pro-Obama concert. Does this mean vote fraud occurred? No, but it illustrates how Election Day has morphed into an amorphous Election Month — or even two.
All this elastic voting arguably offers easier access, but it also facilitates fraud. When voting was limited to Election Day, lawyers and poll watchers could be on the job, but it’s a lot to ask people to stay on temporary watch for 20, 30 or 40 days.
Catherine Engelbrecht, founder of True the Vote, a national watchdog group devoted to cleaning up voter rolls, said monitoring elections is getting more difficult and her group is adjusting to the new realities.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Robert Knight is senior fellow for the American Civil Rights Union and a columnist for The Washington Times.
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- McCLAUGHRY: Finish off the "Islamic State" quickly and cheaply
- Obama's brother wears Hamas scarf bearing anti-Israel slogans in photo
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama: 'Not a new Cold War,' but new Russia sanctions announced
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine