- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
- CDC sees measles spike and ‘failure to vaccinate’
- Ex-Secret Service agent seeking Md. seat: Everyone’s a ‘de facto criminal’ now
- New prosthetic hand technology lets amputees feel again
- Child killed, 4 injured in Idaho elementary school bus crash
HURT: Washington’s financial miscreants sucker us
Only in a town like this would criminally reckless and penniless grifters still be at the bargaining table as their debtors and creditors pick through the rubble of the financial ruin they themselves created.
This Congress has for decades stolen billions out of our personal retirement account to fund an obscene lavishness and political nest-feathering that would make a king blush. Perhaps the king only feared having his head on a pike and his crown skittering down the cobblestone — but he still would blush.
In recent years when one party firmly controlled both chambers of Congress and the White House, not only did it fail to curb spending or find new “revenue,” it failed to perform the simplest, most basic task of agreeing on a budget. And that was with one-party rule!
President Obama, who twice has earned voters’ support based on the notion that he is a sensible and trustworthy adult, has perhaps the worst individual record of them all.
When he opened his absurdly named Fiscal Responsibility Summit shortly after taking office in 2009, he reiterated his promise to cut the massive deficit.
“Today I’m pledging to cut the deficit we inherited by half by the end of my first term in office,” he said, explaining how wrong it would be to leave such calamitous debt to our children.
“I refuse to leave our children with a debt that they cannot repay, and that means taking responsibility right now, in this administration, for getting our spending under control,” he said.
When Mr. Obama took office, the debt was $10.6 trillion. Today, after he dismissed his Fiscal Responsibility Summit findings with barely a grunt and apparently hosted nightly cash bonfires in the Rose Garden, our debt surpasses $16 trillion.
Neither party should be spared our scorn. As Mr. Obama has railed so righteously for years, President George W. Bush and a Republican-controlled Congress devised two expensive wars without insisting they be paid for with spending cuts that everyone would feel.
The stunning hypocrisy is that now Mr. Obama is doing precisely the same thing by creating a massive new health care entitlement program that is paid for by assumed savings and efficiencies never before seen in the history of this federal government. What makes this even worse than Mr. Bush’s wars is that wars end eventually. Government entitlement programs live forever.
If all this financial carnage had been committed by anyone else or by any other entity, such as a corporation, the whole lot would have been rounded up and thrown into jail. A bankruptcy judge would sift through the wreckage to see how the dupes, creditors and shareholders might recoup some of their massive losses. And if any of the collaborators in the Ponzi scheme ever saw the light of day again, they would spend the rest of their lives in debtors prison.
At the very least, you might think, their fiduciary responsibility in the government surely would be taken away from them.
But not here. Not in this town. Not with this crowd.
Here, they still have a seat at the table negotiating this and that. If history is any guide (which it almost always is) these decisions will only further wreck things.
Not only are they still at the table, they are the only ones at the table, and we suckers — the unwitting co-signers on their financial calamity — stand on the sidelines watching them debate.
Is it any wonder, then, that the one reigning principle on which both sides seem to have reached an agreement is that under no circumstances will they stop or slow spending money we do not have unless and until they finalize arrangements for you and me to give them some more of our hard-earned money?
• Charles Hurt can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
About the Author
- HURT: Postal Service misses address by a whole continent
- HURT: Let us all give thanks for George Mason and the Bill of Rights
- HURT: Obama is a greater threat than Toronto's crack mayor Rob Ford
- HURT: It's the Democrats, not the GOP, facing a looming civil war
- HURT: Sarah Palin knew a death panel when she saw one
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Budget negotiators look to federal workers for benefit concessions
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- New battlefront emerges in war between Republicans, tea party
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- Blast of winter weather heads to D.C. area
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Happiness is attainable. Morning to night. I love to teach, deal with folks that have an issue and really wish to tackle it and write.
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
A collection of reader guest articles, thoughts and opinions by Communities writers and breaking news and information.
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
White House pets gone wild!