- Beretta leaves Maryland over gun laws, heads for Tennessee
- Neal Boortz defends Hillary Clinton for representing child rapist
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
Senate orders study on U.S. no-fly zone in Syria
Question of the Day
The Senate voted Tuesday to order President Obama to study what military options the U.S. would have if it wanted to get more deeply involved in the revolt against Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.
Backers said it was meant to be a "reasonable assessment" of what U.S. forces can do to degrade Mr. Assad's air power, but opponents said the study would mark a first step toward the kind of "no-fly zone" Mr. Obama imposed on Libya two years ago.
"This amendment is simply a way of saying we in the Senate are concerned, care about the slaughter going on in Syria and agitated [that] those in the rest of the world are not doing more," said Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut independent.
The 92-6 vote came as part of the annual defense policy debate. Minutes after the amendment was approved, the Senate voted 98-0 to pass the broader bill, which lays out everything from troop levels to restrictions on how the military fights the war on terror.
With the U.S. involved in Afghanistan and with the Middle East still simmering in the wake of the Arab Spring, policymakers are grappling with what role America should play.
Backers said the classified assessment from the Pentagon of a no-fly zone plan would help inform Congress as to what options there are for the U.S. to try to contain the regime in Syria, which is engaged in a pitched battle with rebels.
Among the options the Pentagon would study would be the no-fly zone, deploying air-defense systems such as Patriot missile batteries to neighboring countries, or engaging in air strikes to take out Syrian aircraft.
The study does not authorize U.S. force.
But Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky Republican, said the amendment smacks of the beginning of involvement.
"I think it's a bad idea to discuss contingency plans for war," he said.
He said the last no-fly zone the U.S. led, in Libya, has produced a questionable result, ousting dictator Moammar Gadhafi but replacing him with a government that is not clearly pro-American. And he pointed to the results of elections in Egypt, where the Muslim Brotherhood's candidate won the presidency, as another sign of worry.
The defense bill will now have to be squared with the House, which passed its own version earlier this year.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The president could pay the full price for ignoring Congress
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- Gen. James Amos, Marine Corps commandant, slams Obama's handling of Iraq
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
- LYONS: Small-arms treaty, big Second Amendment threat
- EDITORIAL: Obamacare in intensive care
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq