- Beretta leaves Maryland over gun laws, heads for Tennessee
- Neal Boortz defends Hillary Clinton for representing child rapist
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
House Democrats petition for a vote on tax-cut extension
Question of the Day
Looking to break the “fiscal cliff” gridlock, House Democrats are attempting to use a “discharge petition,” a little-known procedural move, to get around Speaker John A. Boehner and force a House vote on extending the Bush-era tax cuts for everyone except individuals making $200,000 and more and couples making $250,000.
Such a vote would give Republicans who want to abandon the speaker and the GOP “no-higher-tax-rates” position a chance to buck party leaders and cut their own deal with Democrats to avert the “fiscal cliff” — the automatic spending cuts and tax increases that will take effect in January.
No Republicans have signed or said they would sign the petition, but Democrats are optimistic they can find more than two dozen GOP lawmakers needed to send the stalled bill to the floor for a vote — especially if negotiations between the president and Mr. Boehner remain stalled.
“The discharge petition, while we do want to get it to the [House] floor, it can also be a catalyst to move people,” said Rep. Timothy J. Walz, a Minnesota Democrat who filed the petition on behalf of his party. “It sends a signal to [House Speaker John A.] Boehner that, if he gets a few of his members on it, it maybe frees him up for a little bit of negotiating.”
The petition calls for House action on a bill that passed the Democrat-controlled Senate this year that would keep George W. Bush-era tax cuts in place for individuals earning up to $200,000 and couples making up to $250,000. For those earning more — about 2 percent of taxpayers — the tax breaks would expire as scheduled in January.
Republicans have expressed little interest in the measure and say they want the tax breaks extended to all income levels.
Democrats were inspired in part to try the unconventional approach after Rep. Tom Cole, Oklahoma Republican, last month said he would be willing to let the tax cuts expire for the nation’s most wealthy as a way to help avoid the looming “fiscal cliff.”
Rep. Walter B. Jones, a moderate Republican from North Carolina, also said he would consider signing the petition.
Discharge petitions require a simple majority of the House’s 435 members, or 218 votes, to advance a stalled bill toward a full floor vote. If all of the chamber’s 191 Democrats sign Mr. Walz’s petition, the support of 27 Republicans would be needed to get the bill to the House floor.
If the required signatures are secured this week, the earliest likely day that the bill could be brought to the floor under House rules is Dec. 24.
Thirteen Democrats haven’t signed the petition, which was filed Tuesday. Mr. Walz said he expects most, if not all, Democrats to give their support. He noted that many who haven’t done so were out of town last week and said no Democrat has refused to sign the petition.
Getting “the 191 Democrats on it, that’s great, that’s nice, that shows unity. But the real story is when you get the first Republican,” Mr. Walz said. “There are some [Republican] members that might simply see this as a way to kind of change the debate.”
Mr. Walz said the petition isn’t meant to shame or coerce rank-and-file House Republicans to accept a tax deal against their party leaders’ wishes. Rather, he said, it offers a generally nonconfrontational path for Republicans who quietly agree with the Democratic measure.
“I’m very cognizant that this is very difficult vote for a lot of colleagues, and I’m not gleeful in twisting that in anymore,” he said. “I want to reach a compromise that works for everybody.”
But Republicans have reason to be leery of crossing the House speaker. Last week, Mr. Boehner took several Republicans — including Mr. Jones — off committees when their voting records weren’t considered in line with the party.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at email@example.com.
- GOP tests Democrats on college loan issue
- Lawmakers outside intelligence loop get miffed about briefing structure in Congress
- John Boehner: Time is right to bring latest farm bill to House floor
- Supreme Court nears rulings on key voting rights cases
- N.J. Gov. Christie picks state A.G. to fill U.S. Senate seat
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The president could pay the full price for ignoring Congress
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- Gen. James Amos, Marine Corps commandant, slams Obama's handling of Iraq
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- LYONS: Small-arms treaty, big Second Amendment threat
- Pentagon team dispatched to Ukraine amid crisis with Russia
- Obama family set to buy $4.25M desert home in California: report
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq