Chief prosecutor Brig. Gen. Mark Martins defended the military commissions system, comparing the hearing to one comparable under federal civilian court.
During the hearing this week, chief judge Army Col. James Pohl ruled on fewer than one-fourth of the motions. The next hearing for Al Nashiri is scheduled for the end of October.
As far as the families and survivors are concerned, the procedural issues are necessary to get to a trial date, but they are still frustrated by the legal process.
“I heard a lot of things about Nashiri’s rights,” Joe Pelley, a senior chief petty officer who survived the attack.
“Personally I don’t care about his rights, because he didn’t care about our rights. … He didn’t care that he masterminded this whole operation to blow up, in my opinion, innocent people.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.
A collection of reader guest articles, thoughts and opinions by Communities writers and breaking news and information.
Great discoveries in the world of restaurants and chefs fulfill the quest for delicious food and cooking.
Paul Rondeau dissects the propaganda, media tricks, and other shenanigans targeting our families, faith, and freedom…and even life itself
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention