- ‘Gay Jeans’ that fade into rainbow-colored denim created
- Divided court strikes down big porn award
- Jimmy Carter: Don’t hurt Russian people with sanctions
- Oldest ex-MLB player dies in Cuba, 2 days shy of 103rd birthday
- ‘Top Gun’ for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy’s approval
- Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
- Pfc. Bradley Manning is now Pfc. Chelsea Manning: Court says so
- Secret base U.S. special forces used to train Libyans now under terrorist control: report
- 9th suspect in N.C. kidnapping turns self in to FBI
- L.A. sheriff admits to testing flyover spy program without notifying residents
Crossroads’ ad takes sides, says watchdog
Complains content disguised by group
A government watchdog group has filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission against Crossroads GPS, the conservative advocacy group affiliated with the super PAC American Crossroads, over an ad the organization is running on several U.S. Senate candidates, including Virginia Democrat Tim Kaine.
The complaint alleges that the ads advocate for or against a specific candidate, and therefore must be reported to the FEC. Crossroads, which was founded in part by senior GOP political strategist Karl Rove, maintains that its spots are apolitical “issue” ads, and therefore do not need to be reported.
Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), said that Crossroads “wants to have its cake and eat it too.”
“By disguising political ads as issue ads, Crossroads is trying to do an end run around the law,” she said.
The 30-second spot in Virginia, part of a $2.5 million ad buy that includes Ohio and North Dakota, identifies Mr. Kaine, a former governor who is also the former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, as “a cheerleader for massive spending,” while showing video clips of him complimenting President Obama’s $800 billion-plus economic stimulus package.
“Tell Tim Kaine for real job growth, stop backing reckless spending,” the narrator says toward the end.
The complaint argues that the ad campaign should be considered an “independent expenditure” that Crossroads did not report to the FEC.
“Mr. Kaine has not held public office in more than two years, and currently has no role in making public policy,” the CREW complaint reads. “In this context, telling Mr. Kaine to stop backing reckless spending can only be construed as telling him what his policies should be if he is elected to the Senate. In addition, the advertisement provided no contact information, demonstrating that the ad’s actual intent was not to encourage viewers to tell Mr. Kaine anything. The advertisement’s only reasonable interpretation, therefore, is to encourage actions to defeat Mr. Kaine, and its electoral portion is unmistakable, unambiguous, and suggestive of only one meaning.”
The challenge comes as the line between electioneering, advocacy, and public welfare are becoming increasingly blurry.
A conservative group and a candidate for the Indiana House of Representatives want to link political action committees, which can accept up to $5,0000 per person; super PACs like American Crossroads, which can accept unlimited contributions; and nonprofit groups like Crossroads GPS, which qualify as “social welfare” groups under the tax code and can shield the source of some of their money.
There is currently a ban on “coordination” between candidates and independent groups that support them, which was the foundation for the Supreme Court’s campaign finance decision that the new groups would not corrupt the political process.
“Obviously, these candidates can’t vote to repeal the Affordable Care Act or decrease the budget deficit,” Ms. Sloan said. “Pretending these ads are not political makes a mockery of federal election and tax law.”
A new nonpartisan group called “unPAC” also launched a push this week to get NBC to refuse to broadcast ads from super PACs and special-interest groups during the Olympics.
Earlier this month, Restore Our Future, a super PAC supporting Mitt Romney, bought more than $7 million in ads to air specifically during the London Olympics. The group noted that networks have previously established a “no advocacy ads” policies during major sporting events; NBC, citing such a policy, refused to air advocacy ads during the 2009 Super Bowl.
“Super PACs are the political equivalent to juicing,” said unPAC.org Campaigns Director Matthew Palevsky. “They’re already corrupting our elections, and NBC shouldn’t let them ruin the Olympics.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Supreme Court pushes consideration of N.J. gun case to April 25
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- Michael Bloomberg charts $50M challenge to NRA: 'Got to make them afraid'
- McAuliffe's PAC off to fast start, with $254,000 raised in two weeks
- Virginia Republican Bob Marshall stands by remarks that raise eyebrows
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- Kansas will nullify local regulation of guns
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Obama avoids 'red line' for China; prepared to impose tougher sanctions on Russia
- Brain surgery victim struggles with Obamacare: 'It's scary'
- 2-week truce for hot sauce maker, California city
- Twitter blocks accounts critical of Turkish government
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014