- ‘Harry Potter’ religion class seeks to enlighten students on ‘God, sin, and theodicy’
- ‘Optionally piloted’ Black Hawk helicopter clears tests; future missions to go ‘fully unmanned’
- Vice News reporter kidnapped in Ukraine is freed after being beaten, blindfolded
- FCC’s new ‘net neutrality’ proposal sparks outrage among consumer advocates
- Families of ferry’s lost confront South Korean officials
- 2-week truce for Sriracha hot sauce maker, California city
- NYC’s de Blasio seeks to ban wood-burning fireplaces
- Residents angry Obama mispronounced town’s name during mudslide visit
- Israel halts peace talks with Palestinians
- Netanyahu’s driver accused of raping girls under age 12
Maryland special session will address gambling questions
Leaders tout job creation, revenue as reasons to act now
Maryland legislators will be cutting their summer vacations short after Gov. Martin O'Malley announced a special session for Aug. 9 to address gambling questions left unanswered in the spring.
But after Mr. O'Malley repeatedly urged state leaders to “put the issues behind us so we can move forward,” some people are wondering whether the decision was a risky bluff.
It’s the second special session this summer — Mr. O'Malley called the first one in mid-May to wrap up the budget — and the issues of table game expansion at Maryland’s existing casinos and adding a sixth casino in Prince George’s County were largely used as the reasons why the General Assembly adjourned without passing a budget during the regular session.
“I think we had an emergency situation when we adjourned sine die without a budget,” Mr. O'Malley, a Democrat, said at a Friday news conference announcing next month’s special session. Flanked by House Speaker Michael E. Busch, Anne Arundel Democrat,and Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr., Prince George’s Democrat, as well as Prince George’s County Executive Rushern L. Baker III, a Democrat, and Mr. O'Malley, touted job creation and revenue as reasons why the gambling issues require immediate action.
The timing and justification, however, created some skepticism.
Senate Minority Leader E.J. Pipkin, Cecil Republican, issued a statement Friday afternoon criticizing the governor’s reasoning for the session.
“The real crisis in Maryland is not whether there should be a sixth casino location, but rather the trend of recent job losses,” Mr. Pipkin said. “The state is bleeding jobs at a rate of tens of thousands on a monthly basis, and the best the Governor O'Malley can muster is, ‘If you give me another casino, I can get you 3,000 jobs in a few years.’”
Todd Eberly, coordinator of public policy studies at St. Mary’s College of Maryland, questioned whether the emergency was a legitimate one or “a political emergency.”
“I think it would be very hard to argue that a special session to decide an issue of putting a casino in National Harbor really rises to the level for calling a special session,” Mr. Eberly said “Luckily, ‘emergency’ has no real firm definition in politics. Never mind that it [expanding gambling] has to go before voters and voters may actually reject it.”
The Maryland Secretary of State certifies ballot language on the third Monday in August so any item that will be considered by voters this year must be approved by Aug. 20.
According to data provided by the National Conference of State Legislatures, Maryland is one of 34 states where the governor or legislature can call a special session. So far this year, Maryland is one of 11 states to call a special session. Last year, more than a dozen states, including Maryland, did so. Arizona alone had four.
The reasons for special sessions can range anywhere from budgetary issues, to economic development, health care, redistricting, coastal management and prison relocation. Maryland’s special session last year was to pass the new congressional redistricting map in time for November’s House of Representatives elections.
In a statement from House Minority Leader Anthony J. O’Donnell, Calvert Republican, and Minority Whip Jeannie Haddaway-Riccio, Eastern Shore Republican, the two leaders called the decision a “get-it-done-quick- special session” and warned that not enough time would be given for public comment.
Mr. Miller said he expects the session to go about two or three days.
“This is a full time job, we’re paid a decent salary, the people who elect us have a right to expect us to be here in spite of family vacations or any other previous plans,” Mr. Miller said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Meredith Somers is a Metro reporter for The Washington Times. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Chris Brown's assault trial delayed by D.C. judge
- In the company of a saint: Catholic Church will canonize Pope John Paul and Pope John XXIII
- Chris Brown assault trial delayed again
- '8THEIST' plate denial sparks lawsuit in New Jersey
- Faith scores again at the box office
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
- In its hunt for Senate, Republican candidates campaign against Harry Reid
- Obamacare class-action suit opens a new legal front
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- List Hillary Clinton's successes? State Dept. spokeswoman flubs answer
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- 'Conservatives' should feel exposed by Bundy's racist comments: Scarborough
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Sold out: Ukraine's leadership swapped best military weapons for cash
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014