- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
EDITORIAL: The Sebelius savings plan
When fewer human beings are better
Question of the Day
There’s something perverse about a government $15.5 trillion in the red espousing a strategy to “save money” by discouraging the birth of human beings. That’s what Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius is advocating through the implementation of President Obama’s contraception mandate.
Earlier this month, Mrs. Sebelius told a House panel probing the president’s fiscal 2013 budget that the mandate won’t impose a financial burden on employers and insurance companies because the cost of contraceptives and sterilizations will be balanced by lower medical costs from fewer births: “The reduction in the number of pregnancies compensates for the cost of contraception,” she told the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health.
“So you are saying, by not having babies born, we are going to save money on health care?” asked an incredulous Rep. Tim Murphy, Pennsylvania Republican. “Providing contraception is a critical preventive health benefit for women and for their children,” replied Mrs. Sebelius, retreating behind policy boilerplate. “Not having babies born is a critical benefit?” asked Mr. Murphy. “This is absolutely amazing to me.”
The secretary’s testimony reveals a diabolical view of the mission of Health and Human Services. For the agency, a human being now represents little more than a debit entry on a balance sheet. In other words, the fewer, the better. Accordingly, Uncle Sam recommends insurers achieve savings by preventing babies from being born and winding up in the expense column.
The Obama administration has a plan to save money at the end of life as well: Obamacare, the president’s venture into socialized medicine, has established an Independent Payment Advisory Board, which is empowered to ration expenses paid by Medicare for the health care costs of elderly Americans. Inevitably, efficiencies will come from denial of treatment. For the very ill, that could spell death.
Obama health policy reveals its roots in secular humanism, a philosophy based on reason alone that rejects the existence of the spiritual. With this mindset, it’s easy to view human beings as commodities with a price tag. That perspective stands in stark contrast to religious tradition familiar to Americans, which contends that individuals are fashioned in the image of the divine. People are, the Founders believed, “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” When human beings are commoditized, then birth is no longer a miracle of life but akin to a date of manufacture. Death resembles an expiration date, and both are viewed as events to be managed.
It’s no wonder that religious organizations are up in arms over the Obama contraception mandate. The Catholic Church in particular considers contraception alien to a fundamental understanding of the sanctity of life. Enforcement of the rule against church institutions would be a clear violation of their First Amendment right to free exercise of religion.
If Kathleen Sebelius sees her job as saving money by discouraging life, then she needs a new title: secretary of health and human prevention.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Take a first look at The Washington Times' new dynamic website
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: West shouldn't pander to Putin
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: 'Redskins' hardly the only offender
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Radar, torpedos to end Hamas tunnels?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Gaza 'analysis' poorly veiled bigotry
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
Get Breaking Alerts
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- House GOP resurrects border bill, predicts successful Friday vote
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Islamic militants seize Benghazi as U.S. evacuates Libya