- The Washington Times - Tuesday, March 20, 2012

A year after House Republicans misfired on their plan to overhaul Medicare, they’re going right back at it in the budget they proposed Tuesday, tweaking the details but signaling their willingness to engage in a political battle over entitlement reform — even in an election year.

It’s the third such GOP plan in the past month to try to change Medicare, and it runs smack into the White House and congressional Democrats, who say the GOP is tangling with an issue that will cost them votes in November.

The plan introduced Tuesday came from House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, who revised key elements of his Medicare plan from last year, but still proposes having the federal program compete with private plans and giving seniors a voucher to choose the plan they like.

“If we allow entitlement politics — fear that your adversaries will turn your reforms into a political weapon used against you, and we cow to that — then America is going to have a debt crisis,” the Wisconsin Republican said.

Medicare is the fastest-growing large entitlement program and could eclipse Social Security spending by 2040, far outstripping the funding sources Congress has dedicated to it.

All sides agree that it needs changes — a task that demands raising taxes, cutting benefits or some combination of the two. But Republicans and Democrats are struggling to find any common ground over how to make it sustainable.

Instead of doing away entirely with fee-for-service Medicare, as his plan suggested last year, Mr. Ryan proposes maintaining the traditional plan while allowing private plans to compete in an exchange where seniors could use vouchers to select from a number of options. Those currently younger than 55 would participate in the system starting in 2023, while the plan wouldn’t change things for current seniors.

Mr. Ryan unveiled the plan in December along with Sen. Ron Wyden, Oregon Democrat, and on Tuesday he included it in his 2013 budget proposal, on which he will ask his House colleagues to vote.

Other Republicans also have tried to tackle the issue, though those plans — one led by Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, and another last week by four Republican senators, led by Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky — have yet to win any Democratic backing.

A major difference is over how much to cut Medicare spending, with Mr. Ryan proposing spending $205 billion less on the entitlement program over 10 years than what President Obama had suggested. Mr. Ryan’s plan would hold Medicare spending to 4.75 percent of gross domestic product by 2050, down from the likely scenario of 7.25 percent projected by the Congressional Budget Office.

Mr. Obama, in his 2013 budget, proposed cutting $267 billion from Medicare over a decade.

Another key sticking point is how to curb Medicare costs. Republicans argue that they have a better strategy than Democrats.

In Mr. Ryan’s vision, plans in the new exchange would compete annually to determine the dollar amount of the subsidy seniors could use to purchase coverage, with the second least expensive private plan or fee-for-service Medicare — whichever is cheaper — to be used as a benchmark.

If seniors chose a more expensive plan, they would be responsible for paying the difference, while those selecting a less-expensive plan would be awarded a rebate. Growth would be capped at GDP plus 0.5 percent in case the bidding failed to contain costs.

Democrats blasted the plan, saying it would shift costs to seniors.

Story Continues →