- Country singer Tim McGraw not sorry for slapping female fan: ‘Things happen’
- Iraq vet cited for owning 14 therapeutic pet ducks
- White House takes credit for drop in unaccompanied children at border
- International crises be damned, Obama’s fundraising trip must go on
- Friend of bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev found guilty of impeding probe
- Train with MH17 plane crash bodies leaves rebel town in Ukraine
- Half of Colorado voters are OK with Hobby Lobby decision, poll shows
- HIV-killing condom to soon hit shelves in Australia
- Estonia pulls plug on Steven Seagal over praise for Putin
- Lawyer: Pelvic exam pics cost Hopkins $190 million
House bill reins in Census Bureau, Justice
Immigration, voter-ID lawsuits and annual surveys are targets
Question of the Day
House Republicans voted this week to kill a major part of the census and to rein in the Obama administration’s lawsuits against states over immigration laws, voter-identification laws and gay-marriage statutes — but gave a thumbs-up to Mr. Obama’s battle with states that have medical marijuana laws.
The votes came as the House passed its first spending bill of the year, which funds the Commerce and Justice Departments, among other agencies, and it underscored the free-wheeling atmosphere that the Republican Party has allowed in its spending debates since taking control of the chamber last year.
Those rules have allowed House Republicans to attack many of the Obama policies they oppose, and to settle some long-term scores — such as reining in the Census Bureau.
Conservatives have long argued the agency pries too deeply into Americans’ lives with its long-form questionnaire, which over the past decade has become the American Community Survey. The ACS doesn’t replace the decennial census, but rather is taken every year of a smaller group of Americans, giving the Census Bureau continually updated data.
“We need to ask ourselves whether this survey is worth $2.4 billion,” said Rep. Daniel Webster, Florida Republican, who offered the amendment to eliminate the ACS.
Other targets for Republicans were centered on what they see as Obama administration overreach and passed on overwhelmingly party-line votes, including:
• An amendment blocking the administration from taking actions that contradict the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage for federal purposes as the union of a man and a woman. That amendment passed 245-171, with 16 Democrats voting with the majority and seven Republicans voting against it.
• A provision that prevents the administration from pursuing cases against Arizona and other states that have passed immigration crack-down laws. That passed 238-173 with 12 Democrats voting for it and six Republicans — notably, the party’s Cuban-American members from Florida — voting against it.
• An amendment that halts the Obama administration’s efforts to prevent states from enhancing their voter-identification laws. It was the most polarizing of the efforts to control the Justice Department, passing on a 232-190 vote with only one Democrat, Rep. Jason Altmire of Pennsylvania, supporting it, and seven Republicans opposing it.
But the House didn’t want to rein in the administration’s efforts across the board. An amendment offered by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, California Republican, to keep the Justice Department from meddling in states that allow medical marijuana use, was soundly defeated, 262-163. Only 28 Republicans voted to end the Obama administration’s actions, joining 135 Democrats who said their president’s Justice Department was going too far.
Republicans said the debate showed they are looking to push back against a president who seems at war with states.
“There is a very strong sentiment that the Congress needs to reassert itself in a whole host of areas where the executive branch is not essentially following long-standing policies established by law by the federal government,” said Rep. Robert G. Goodlatte, Virginia Republican.
While Democrats have called for free-wheeling House rules, they criticized the end result on the spending bill. House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat, said the amendments that got attached to the House bill made it unpalatable to most Democrats.
But House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Virginia Republican, said that’s the result of letting lawmakers offer any amendments they wish, and insist on votes — something that Democrats avoided in the final years they were in control.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- Edward Snowden to work with Russia on anti-spy technology
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
- More immigrants deported from New Mexico center
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- Ron Paul: U.S. partly to blame for Malaysia Airlines disaster
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- Pro-Russia rebel commander suggests passengers died days before Malaysian flight
- Vladimir Putin pressured to aid Ukraine plane crash probe, rein in rebels
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq