- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
EDITORIAL: Obama’s leaky underwear bomb
Politically convenient release of classified information hurts national security
Question of the Day
When word broke last week that a terrorist underwear bomb plot had been foiled, it seemed to be an impressive American victory. The initial Associated Press report revealed a CIA informant penetrated high levels of al Qaeda of the Arabian Peninsula, made off with their most sophisticated new bomb and provided information leading to a successful drone strike on a leading militant. On the heels of the anniversary of the Osama bin Laden takedown, it seemed to further burnish the Obama administration’s national security credentials.
Many commentators, particularly former intelligence officials, found the amount of information in the leaked story troubling. Whoever gave the goods to the press had access to a degree of detail implying it must have come from a high-level insider. Suspicion grew that the leak was specifically intended to promote the Obama administration’s reputation. Former CIAbin Laden hunter Michael Scheur said that “this does seem to be a tawdry political thing.”
The story got worse. It seems that whoever leaked the story hyped the American contribution to what seems to have been a primarily British-Saudi operation. The MI6 connection was revealed in additional disclosures that effectively compromised and collapsed a major British intelligence operation. Such unauthorized and illegal revelations of top-secret information not only betray sources and methods, but hamper future cooperation between coalition intelligence agencies. A British official meeting with a member of the White House National Security Staff cannot know if he is shaking hands with the very person who will later run to the press with a hot scoop.
On Sunday, Senate Intelligence Chairman Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, said that the entire affair was conducted in an unorthodox and suspicious way. “General procedure would have the chairman and the vice chairman of each of the intelligence committees briefed during the attack or prior to it,” she said on Fox News Sunday. “This was not the case. There was no briefing.” The senator said that “the leak did endanger sources and methods, and the leak I think has to be prosecuted. … The investigation is being done, hopefully concluded and criminal charges will go to the Department of Justice.”
The House Intelligence Committee is conducting its own review before launching a full investigation. Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, Michigan Republican, believes that the leak was “some chest thumping in a political narrative,” and alleged it could have been coordinated at the top. “We do know that the CIA was trying to stop the story,” he said. “And we know that there was a scheduled White House - or at least planned press conference on the particular event, and those two desperate positions leads one to believe that … someone was at odds about how much they should or shouldn’t talk about it.” He added, “This is not anything that should be used for a headline.”
The key data points are there for all to see. All that remains now is to connect the dots.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: A man for 2016
- EDITORIAL: Spies unlike us
- EDITORIAL: Amnesty by another name
- EDITORIAL: Navigating the swindle
- EDITORIAL: Payback time in Wisconsin
Latest Blog Entries
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
Get Breaking Alerts
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Democrats cite pope in call for minimum wage hike, jobless benefits
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness