- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Still refusing to take responsibility
On Wednesday morning, viewers of TV news saw a bevy of politicians demanding congressional hearings on the deadly assault on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, so that preventative measures could be taken and “this never happens again.”
That’s all well and good, but I for one would like some direct answers from our commander in chief as to why and how the Benghazi killings were allowed to happen in the first place. It is not the “fog of war” that obscured this battle, it is the redolent smoke screen generated by White House politics that stings America’s eyes and makes us so nauseous.
During the month preceding the attack this Sept. 11, did President Obama ever take any direct briefings on the developing Libyan situation from the intelligence community? If the president wasn’t in the loop on such a hot-button foreign policy issue, why wasn’t he? Failing that, did he read any indications and warning notices or other threat assessments from Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens‘ mission that landed on his Oval Office desk? If such critical traffic did indeed reach Mr. Obama’s desk in the midst of his presidential campaign, did he exercise due diligence and take the time to fully read it before it became stale news?
While Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was the first to stand up on the burning quarterdeck of our savaged ship of state and accept responsibility, it was an insincere gesture, as she was only the helmsman, carrying out her captain’s steering directions. Accepting responsibility without any attendant consequences has become the fashionable thing for our political leaders to do here in America. There was a time in history when leaders of events that came to no good end knew full well that when they stood up and accepted responsibility for the carnage of their actions, there was going to be hell to pay in their immediate future.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Vietnam says it may have found door of missing Malaysian jet as intel look into stolen passports
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- High schooler suing parents for money shot down by judge
- Italy outraged over U.S. gun dealer's 'David' ad
- Why Malaysia Airlines jet might have disappeared?
- CPAC 2014 straw poll results
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults