You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.

ORIENT: Medicare rationing under Obamacare has started already

Socialist redistribution is opposite of compassion

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

Americans may not like to hear that Medicare is at risk from Obamacare, but the rationing has begun already. At a talk I gave recently, three patients told about their experiences.

One woman said she can no longer obtain her two kinds of eyedrops. Another complained that her doctor does nothing except type into a computer. When one patient needed more than 15 minutes, she was told to make another appointment because others were waiting and the doctor could not afford to get behind schedule.

In the beginning, Obamacare was going to take a mere $500 billion out of Medicare to fund contraceptives and other things for young people. Now the amount is $716 billion. Supporters of the legislation argue that Medicare is not allowed to cut benefits or ration care. Technically, they are correct -- its only tool is to cut the amount it pays doctors, hospitals and others who provide real goods and services.

So what? Doctors already make too much money, right? They make more than the average American, more than doctors in other countries and probably quite a bit more than most seniors on Medicare ever did. But cutting into doctors' profits will impact patients and quality of care. Patients must understand you get what you pay for.

First, doctors spend so much time typing into computers in order to save themselves trouble down the road. They get paid by the documented "bullet point." If they pick the wrong code out of tens of thousands, they could face tens of thousands of dollars in penalties, and even prison.

Obamacare intends for all medical records to be computerized so bureaucrats can scrutinize everybody's care to be sure it meets all the guidelines. New "payment methodologies" will judge whether doctors are doing their part to eliminate the 30 percent of care deemed "unnecessary" or to reduce "disparities" (some people getting more than their "fair share").

With Obamacare, doctors' administrative costs will go up so much that large numbers of independent physicians will retire or join the throng already signing up to work for hospitals and big clinics. Reformers like that. For one thing, employed physicians do about 25 percent less work.

Doctors are dipping into their life savings to pay their staffs, and they risk penalties for not meeting Obamacare targets. Even if you think they make enough money, patients need to recognize that at some point, doctors will quit sacrificing their personal well-being. Arizona dermatologist Joseph Scherzer posted a sign on his office door in 2010: "If you voted for Obamacare, be aware these doors will close before it goes into effect. Unless Congress or the Courts repeal the bill." Now retired, he has time to compose music for the saxophone.

The people we should worry about most are Medicare patients. Eighty-year-olds likely already have received three times more from the system than they put in. Whatever they contributed to "their" Medicare was used immediately for benefits to previous retirees or other items in the federal budget. What current beneficiaries receive comes from the paychecks of younger workers, whose future has been blighted by the federal policies today's Medicare generation voted for. Those workers might not be too sympathetic to their elders' woes.

Seniors' anger may well be a sign of fear. One of the first casualties of socialist redistribution is compassion.

Dr. Jane M. Orient practices internal medicine in Tucson, Ariz., and is executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts