RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) — A bid for U.N. recognition of a state of Palestine is a last-ditch attempt to rescue troubled Mideast peace efforts, a Palestinian spokeswoman said Wednesday, rejecting Israel’s charge that it is an attempt to bypass negotiations.
Hanan Ashrawi, a senior Palestinian official, urged the U.S. to drop its opposition to the bid, dismissing Washington’s stance as “pathetic” and harmful to American interests in the region. The Palestinians have come under intense pressure from the United States, Britain and others to modify the bid but “have not succumbed,” she said.
On Thursday, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas plans to ask the U.N. General Assembly to recognize Palestine in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem, areas Israel captured in the 1967 Mideast war. Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005 but still controls most access.
The vote will not change the situation on the ground, yet the Palestinians still say it is significant.
Mr. Abbas has said U.N. recognition is not meant to replace negotiations with Israel but to improve Palestinian leverage and secure the pre-1967 war frontiers as the baseline for future border talks — an idea Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected.
This does not mean the U.N. vote will pave the way for a quick resumption of talks, which broke down four years ago.
Beyond a 10-month partial halt in 2009 that failed to restart sustained peace talks, Mr. Netanyahu has refused to freeze construction in settlements.
Referring to Israeli settlement building, Ms. Ashrawi said Wednesday that the U.N. bid “is a last-ditch effort, because we believe the two-state solution (a Palestinian state alongside Israel) is in jeopardy as a result of these actions.”
She said if the U.S. “can’t vote yes, at least don’t vote no, because that would be seen as being really pathetic by the rest of the world.”
Mr. Burns told Mr. Abbas that the U.N. vote goes against U.S. interests and that President Obama would make a new push in 2013 to see a Palestinian state formed through negotiations, Mr. Erekat said. Mr. Burns “asked President Abbas to change his mind,” the aide said.
“They can get pieces of paper from the U.N., but they are not going to move peace forward; they are not going to make a Palestinian statehood more real,” he said.
“They boycott Israel. They refuse to talk to us. Who do they plan to make peace with?” he said.
Surveys indicate that most Palestinians have become disillusioned with prospects of setting up a state through negotiations. Two decades of talks have failed to produce results, marred by intransigence and repeated bouts of violence.
The vote comes at an important time domestically for Mr. Abbas, who has watched his political rival, the Islamic militant group Hamas, gain popularity, particularly after holding its own during an Israeli offensive on Hamas-ruled Gaza earlier this month. The military action was aimed at stopping almost daily rocket barrages from the Gaza Strip at southern Israel.
During Israel’s Gaza offensive, Mr. Abbas largely was sidelined at his compound in the West Bank, underscoring international concerns that the deadlock in peace efforts increasingly is weakening him and other Palestinian pragmatists.
France, Spain, Norway, Denmark and Switzerland have pledged support. Germany said it would not support the initiative, while Britain’s foreign secretary said his government would not oppose it. He said Britain would only vote in favor if the Palestinians softened some of the language.
Israel appeared to be backing away from plans to immediately punish the Palestinians for going to the United Nations. Instead, an Israeli government official said, Israel would wait to see whether the Palestinians would use the world body’s expected approval to hurt Israel.
The Palestinians plan to seek membership or access to a number of international and U.N. agencies, including the International Criminal Court, once their statehood bid is approved.
Israel would respond “forcefully” if the Palestinians try to pursue war crimes charges against Israel at the ICC, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss policy considerations. If the Palestinians use their upgraded international status “as a tool to confront Israel in the international arena, there will be a response.”
Until then, he said, Israel will be bound by its obligations to the Palestinians under existing peace agreements, but it won’t necessarily go beyond them. Earlier there was talk of Israel’s retaliating by canceling the partial peace accords.
Associated Press writer Amy Teibel in Jerusalem contributed to this article.
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A carefully guided tour through the confusing world of modern bookselling and publishing.
“Right Angles” explores serious subjects, such as the Islamization of the Middle East and delegitimization of Israel, with humor, candor and a twist.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Weekly agitation from a columnist who many believed to be one of the least likely to become known as a Conservative Republican.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention