- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
D.C. on its way to health care compliance
City got a head start while many states waited on setting up exchanges
Question of the Day
President Obama’s re-election on Tuesday smoothed the way for states to implement his signature health-care reforms, a challenge the District took on with vigor while other states waited to see if Republican opponent Mitt Romney could deliver on a promise to unravel the controversial law.
Board members tasked with rolling out the city’s marketplace of insurance plans — known as a health exchange — expect to gain federal approval of their proposal next week, joining 13 states who took an aggressive approach to the Affordable Care Act’s mandates while other states scramble to set up their own or let the federal government establish one for them. Each state is required to submit its plans to the federal government by Nov. 16.
The exchanges have been described as a Web-based program, akin to the Expedia travel website, with side-by-side comparisons of health plans taking the place of flights or hotel rooms.
“This is a good way to really have a competition among different businesses, in this case the insurance industry, to see which plan is good,” said Dr. Mohammad Akhter, who took a year’s leave of absence as director of the D.C. Department of Health to serve as chairman of the city’s health exchange board.
The District is in a good position to implement its plans, but Dr. Akhter said officials did some “soul searching” before deciding to set up a city-based exchange, officials said. They felt they should provide a marketplace to serve the city’s unique population of about 618,000 residents, of which only about 5 percent are uninsured because of aggressive efforts to cover residents under Medicaid or the D.C. Healthcare Alliance, which enrolls many immigrants who are not eligible for the federal program.
From the start, Dr. Akhter said he insisted that the exchange be a commercial enterprise and not an arm of the government. Experts in the field would serve on the exchange’s board, while friends of either Mayor Vincent C. Gray or D.C. Council members would not.
“The exchange is not a government entity. It’s an independent commercial venture,” Dr. Akhter said Thursday in an interview with editors and reporters at The Washington Times. “I even moved for getting the domain name. It’s not dot-gov or dot-org — it is dot-com.”
Legislation from the D.C. Council and more than $80 million in federal grants authorized the city to move ahead with its plans for an operational exchange by October 2013. While many states get in gear, the District has launched a public-relations campaign to avert a “collision course” between the government and businesses, according to Dr. Akhter.
“We have one chance to do this right,” he said.
Segments of the small business community pushed back when the board decided in October that the exchange would be the sole health insurance marketplace for individuals and small employers — defined as companies with 50 or fewer workers. Under the settled-upon structure, the exchange is projected to have more than 100,000 customers, which officials have pointed to as a key threshold for it to thrive.
The economics of running the exchange would be “unattractive” if the small employers were not brought in, Dr. Hank J. Aaron, a board member, said.
But critics of the plan have lingering concerns. Hannah Turner, who speaks for a coalition of businesses that objected in October to the small-employer component, said they worry about potential “limits of choice” within the exchange structure.
The D.C. Chamber of Commerce is also keeping an eye on policymakers. It supports Mr. Obama’s law and the city’s health exchange, but has “major concerns” with current plans for implementation, spokesman Max Farrow said.
“The chamber’s stance, in short, is that the (exchange) authority should not restrict small businesses to purchasing through the exchange alone,” he said. “Lack of choice and competition will drive up costs, which makes no sense when small businesses are leading our fragile economic recovery and already must strive to compete with Maryland and Virginia.”
The exchange board provided a concession of sorts by capping the definition of small groups at 50 employees, however, instead of the 100 maximum the federal law mandates as of 2016.
Dr. Aaron said businesses may resort to arguments about fairness or claim it violates the president’s promises to mask other motives. Some companies may have low-cost employees with an average age of 25 and fear the exchange — which, by law, limits the degree to which premiums can vary based on age and other factors — will hamper their economic edge since the exchange is designed to provide broad coverage, he said.
Council member David A. Catania, at-large independent and chairman of the Committee on Health, recently met with business owners “and had a very productive conversation about the exchange,” said Brendan Williams-Kief, the lawmaker’s spokesman.
“It’s important to note that there is still plenty of time and opportunity for public input and dialogue on how the exchange is set up,” he added.
Small businesses can stick with an existing insurance plan if they had it before the health care law passed in 2010, but they must work through the exchange if they switch their plans or make significant changes to them.
While critics say it will be difficult to maintain their grandfathered status, Dr. Akhter said the city is not looking to rock the boat. As the board members see it, the exchange will stabilize the insurance market and establish a transparent relationship between providers and consumers.
“If we disrupt the market place, it benefits no one,” he said, adding later, “Whenever there’s a change, there’s also fear and there are also concerns.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Medicare trust fund to last 4 years longer: Obama administration
- ACLU: Unprecedented U.S. spying has chilling effect on reporters and sources, weakens accountability
- Rep. Mike Rogers: Lock Israel-Palestine negotiators in a room
- Conservative group warns Va. Gov. Terry McAuliffe not to go it alone on Medicaid expansion
- Number-crunchers put GOP chances of retaking Senate at 60 percent: report
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Richard Rahn
Treaty would let tyrants peer into Americans' financial information
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- DeSean Jackson working on offensive cohesiveness with Redskins teammates
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq