GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba — The self-proclaimed mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and his four alleged accomplices appeared Monday in U.S. military court for an oft-delayed pre-trial hearing that will help determine how their eventual trial will be conducted.
Monday’s courtroom appearance was the first by the five 9/11 suspects since May: accused mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed; his nephew, Ali Abdulaziz Ali; Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash; Ramzi bin al-Shibh; and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al-Hawsawi.
All five men wore white long-sleeved shirts and matching pants that extended to their ankles, socks and canvas shoes.
Each man sported long beards, and covered his head with either a traditional Pashtun hat, a Muslim prayer cap, or a keffiyeh, a traditional Arab scarf. Mohammed wore a black vest and glasses, and had a long beard dyed red with henna.
Each was escorted by uniformed military personnel.
During the morning session, they spoke to their defense teams and occasionally to each other. Al-Hawsawi laid a mat on the ground and prayed during a short break in the proceedings.
Army Col. James L. Pohl, the chief presiding officer of the military commission that will try the accused plotters, heard three motions Monday.
He also ruled against a government motion to compel the five suspects to come to each day of the pre-trial hearings this week.
The order in the courtroom was a stark difference from during the May arraignment, when the five refused to answer the judge’s questions or put on headsets translating the proceedings from English to Arabic. In addition, one detainee was restrained for acting out, another had launched into an incoherent rant, and two had stood up during court proceedings to pray, according to the Associated Press.
This time, all five men spoke readily and politely when the judge prompted answers from them.
The only protest came when Mohammed answered a question from the judge, but added: “I don’t think there is any justice in this court.”
Later this week, the court will take up the contested issue of “presumptive classification” — a condition the prosecution wants to implement on the proceedings that could prevent defendants from making any statements in court that their attorneys have a reason to believe could be classified, including information that relates to specific aspects of the CIA [rendition, detention and interrogation] program that remain classified.
The prosecution argues the classification is necessary since the suspects were detained by the CIA before being handed over to authorities at Guantanamo Bay, and could have been exposed to sources and methods used by the CIA to gather intelligence.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
By Rand Paul
Obama acts as though we no longer have a Constitution
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up.
Libertarian thought beyond politics, unrestrained by convention.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention
California wildfires wreak havoc