- Arkansas voter ID law struck down by state judge
- FDA proposes ban on e-cigarette sales to minors
- Bad omen? Italian man crushed to death by John Paul II crucifix
- Company stopped from accepting abortion waste
- Girl surprises Michelle Obama with unemployed dad’s resume
- ‘Harry Potter’ religion class seeks to enlighten students on ‘God, sin, and theodicy’
- ‘Optionally piloted’ Black Hawk helicopter clears tests; future missions to go ‘fully unmanned’
- Vice News reporter kidnapped in Ukraine is freed after being beaten, blindfolded
- FCC’s new ‘net neutrality’ proposal sparks outrage among consumer advocates
- Families of ferry’s lost confront South Korean officials
McCain: Obama acting beyond authority
Senator says White House cannot delay notification of defense layoffs
With the allegation, the Arizona Republican waded into a simmering showdown between defense companies and the administration over whether workers must be warned of possible layoffs associated with pending defense cuts.
Mr. McCain particularly was incensed over recent guidance from the White House budget office that said taxpayers would pay the companies’ legal bills if they are sued for failing to send the notices. Mr. McCain said he would do everything in his power to prevent any government money from being spent for that purpose.
“President Obama is telling defense contractors to ignore the law so that those layoff notices will not be delivered before the November elections,” Mr. McCain said.
He added that companies “have a choice whether to rely on [the White House budget office’s] politically motivated guidance or comply with the law, but I can assure them that I will do everything in my power to ensure that taxpayer dollars are not used to compensate contractors who do not comply with the law.”
In addition, Mr. McCain said he asked Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta to notify Congress of all costs associated with the layoffs at least 30 days in advance of reimbursing contractors for those costs. He also said he “intends to deny” any transfer of funds among defense accounts to pay for these legal costs.
Mr. McCain’s efforts to undermine the administration’s assurances to defense companies is the latest salvo in the partisan battle over automatic cuts to be split equally between defense and domestic spending, known in budget speak as “sequesters.” They will take effect Jan. 2 under the terms of last year’s debt deal unless Congress can overcome the impasse during a lame duck session at the end of the year.
The pending defense cuts could result in as many as a million jobs lost, Mr. McCain said, and while he remains committed to averting them, he cannot support the administration’s plan to use billions of taxpayer dollars to give defense contractors a “free pass” through the election.
“In the current fiscal crisis of trillion-dollar annual deficits and crushing national debt, I cannot condone this administration’s wasteful use of taxpayer funds to buy off contractors for political gain,” he said.
The White House on Tuesday denied it had pressured the companies.
“Absolutely not,” press secretary Jay Carney said. “Individual companies like Lockheed make the decisions according to their own interests.”
Federal law requires companies to let their employees know about possible pink slips 60 days in advance, but sending out the notices just before the election could have angered thousands of voters in Virginia, a hotbed of defense contracting and a swing state crucial to President Obama’s re-election bid.
With defense spending slated to take a hit of more than $55 billion, over the summer defense giants such as Lockheed Martin Corp., BAE Systems PLC, EADS North America and others had said they were planning to notify hundreds of thousands of employees of possible layoffs with the notices going out just before the November election.
To avoid that, the Pentagon and the White House budget office said late last week that the cuts are speculative and they won’t immediately cancel any contracts Jan. 2. They also said the federal government would pick up any costs or liability the companies faced by issuing pink slips without the required warning.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Susan Crabtree is an award-winning investigative reporter with more than 15 years of reporting experience in Washington, D.C. Her reporting about bribery, corruption and conflict-of-interest issues on Capitol Hill has led to several FBI and ethics investigations, as well as consequences for members within their caucuses and at the ballot box. Susan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- GOP senators want IG probe of Sebelius' 'Obamacare' fundraising
- Teaming up with Christie, Obama says Jersey shore 'back in business'
- No Moore: Obama flubs name of Oklahoma city devastated by tornado, calls it 'Monroe'
- Obama to Okla. tornado victims: 'We have got your back'
- Amid his own challenges, Obama calls on Navy grads to hold themselves accountable
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Only IRS employees could expect rewards for failing to pay their taxes
- Holder cancels appearance in OKC amid angry protests
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- In its hunt for Senate, Republican candidates campaign against Harry Reid
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Obamacare class-action suit opens a new legal front
- Sold out: Ukraine's leadership swapped best military weapons for cash
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- Gun control supporters send message to NRA
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- Nevada rancher's racial remarks cost him range of support
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014