- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
DHS grants gay partners discretion in deportation cases
Question of the Day
Homeland Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano said this week gay and lesbian partners will be considered as family members when immigration agents are trying to decide whether or not to try to deport someone from the U.S.
The directive means illegal immigrants in gay or lesbian partnerships with Americans could be spared deportation under the same leniency that is already often accorded to married couples.
But it also raises questions about how it squares with the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which is tied up in the courts. It defines marriage at the federal level as the legal union between a man and a woman.
“In an effort to make clear the definition of the phrase ‘family relationships,’ I have directed ICE to disseminate written guidance to the field that the interpretation of the phrase ‘family relationships’ includes long-term, same-sex partners,” Ms. Napolitano said in a letter Thursday to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.
Mrs. Pelosi led House Democrats this past summer in asking for the change in policy.
The new directive is part of the Obama administration’s recent push to focus deportation efforts on those immigrants who have the longest criminal records or who have repeatedly violated immigration laws. The push is meant to remove the threat of deportation from most rank-and-file illegal immigrants.
The new non-deportation policy has several key parts. One part applies to illegal immigrants who would have qualified for the Dream Act — legislation that never was passed, but which would have given illegal immigrants 30 and under a path to citizenship. Under the new Obama policy, they are given tentative legal status and work permits; though it is not a path to citizenship, which can only be granted by Congress.
The second part to the policy ordered U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to look for extenuating circumstances that might make them less likely targets for deportation. Separation from family was one of those circumstances, which is where the new directive on gay and lesbian partners comes into play.
“This written guidance will simply reiterate existing policy regarding how DHS considers the totality of circumstances presented in individual cases when exercising prosecutorial discretion in enforcement matters,” said department spokesman Peter Boogaard. He said the 2011 policy on extenuating circumstances was always meant to apply to same-sex couples, and this new directive will make that clear.
Mrs. Pelosi and her fellow Democrats said they are aware of “several instances” over the past year when same-sex partners were deported anyway — and said this new written directive should prevent that.
“Our nation is served when loving families are kept together,” Mrs. Pelosi said Friday.
The new directive covers illegal immigrants, but Mrs. Pelosi and fellow Democrats said they are still fighting to allow same-sex partners to immigrate legally under the same rules as other married couples.
Gay couples say the Defense of Marriage Act, a 1996 law passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President Clinton, prohibits them from applying for immigration benefits because the law defines marriage at the federal level as the union of a man and a woman.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, said DOMA should have prevented the new Homeland Security directive as well.
“No president had the right to do that. It conflicts with their oath of office to enforce laws and abide by the Constitution,” he said. “If the administration doesn’t like a law, they should wait until it’s changed, not ignore it. That’s called democracy.”
Homeland Security officials didn’t respond to a question about how this new policy squared with DOMA.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Senators work late on 'take it or leave it' defense bill that ignores big issues
- Illegal immigrant girl smuggled into U.S. by federal agents: judge
- Deportations under Obama plunge to just 1 percent
- White House says it's open to 45 of panel's proposed 46 NSA changes
- Democrats cite pope in call for minimum wage hike, jobless benefits
Latest Blog Entries
By Michael P. Orsi
Edward Snowden should declare his patriotism in court
- Citing 'unfair system,' Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- EDITORIAL: Red faces at the White House
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- PRUDEN: 'Tis the season for apologies
- Special ops vets slam military benefit cuts
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Southern Fried Politics from the Lens of a Persian-American Millennial
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow