- WWII vet en route to Pearl Harbor event booted from flight
- SWAT team at Phoenix hospital as armed man clears emergency room
- Kim Jong-un’s uncle dragged from political meeting, booted from party
- Big storm dumps snow on East Coast, travel dicey
- Thai prime minister dissolves Parliament, calls elections
- Hagel to meet with Pakistan’s prime minister
- Kiev: Riot police deployed near protest sites
- Elton John blasts Russia’s anti-gay laws during Moscow concert
- U.N.: Afghanistan slow to enforce law protecting women
- Heart cancels SeaWorld concert after ‘Blackfish’ documentary
Obama inauguration fueled by corporations, unions
Chevron, Boeing and other companies whose fortunes are heavily dependent on government action or inaction were among the companies that gave $23 million to President Obama for his inauguration party, with the politician who ordinarily demonizes corporate money relying primarily on such sources, rather than individuals, for the $44 million gala in January.
AT&T Inc. gave $4.6 million, Microsoft Corp. gave $2.1 million, oil giant Chevron Corp. and defense contractor Boeing Co. gave $1 million each, and healthcare firm Genentech Inc. gave $750,000, a filing showed this weekend.
Unions also pitched in heavily, with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the Teamsters, the National Education Association and the International Association of Firefighters giving a quarter-million each, on top of a half-million from the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices.
Mr. Obama’s presidential campaign rejected funds from corporate political action committees and lobbyists, asserting that it amounted to interest-peddling, as did his 2009 inauguration. The nonprofit that Mr. Obama is now using to rally the public behind his legislative priorities initially said it would accept corporate money but then changed course. That makes the inaugural party the most direct example to date of corporations currying financial favor with Mr. Obama.
The funds helped finance the parade and other festivities surrounding Mr. Obama’s ceremonial swearing-in Jan. 21. Large-dollar donors got special tickets to exclusive balls with political VIPs.
“Our guidelines aren’t just consistent with the law — they are consistent with the president’s commitment to transparency and to reducing the influence of PACs and lobbyists in Washington,” the inaugural committee said in a statement.
One goal in letting corporations foot the bill seemed to be mitigating donor fatigue among Mr. Obama’s donors, who had been bombarded with incessant requests for months.
“President Obama is the only president who has refused to accept donations from PACs and lobbyists for his inaugural committee,” it said — a refusal that means nothing given that the corporations those PACs and lobbyists represent could give directly.
Unlike contributions to political campaigns, the law allows gifts of any size to inaugural committees, but previous presidents have imposed their own limits, with George W. Bush accepting contributions of $100,000 or less in 2001 and $250,000 or less in 2005.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Luke Rosiak is a projects reporter on The Washington Times’ investigative team. He formerly covered lobbying and campaign finance for two watchdog groups as well as transportation for The Washington Post. Luke can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Md. couple indicted in scheme to cheat SBA on minority contracts
- As federal agencies trim fat, contracts feed billions in profits to 59 companies
- Conflict of interest in $4 billion government minority program
- $4 billion program for disadvantaged businesses lacks oversight
- Maryland's minority-contracting program gets failing grade on 'graduation'
Latest Blog Entries
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- EDITORIAL: Health care hardball
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- FENNO: Mike Shanahan's empty words no salve to free-falling Redskins
- POWELL: The Fed's scandalous monetary policy
- As the unemployed wait, lawmakers debate about extended benefits
- Sen. Rand Paul: Supreme Court needs to re-examine Fourth Amendment
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Al Maurer provides a common sense, conservatarian, Constitutional conservative perspective from the battleground state of Colorado
Film Reviews and Articles by Kevin Williams
"Critical thinking is thinking about your thinking while you're thinking in order to make your thinking better." - Dr. Richard Paul
Let it snow
White House pets gone wild!