- Colorado school drops sexual harassment label on boy who kissed girl’s hand
- Australia court strikes down 5-day-old, gay-marriage law
- Fake interpreter at Mandela service: ‘Sorry,’ I have schizophrenia
- George Zimmerman will not be charged in domestic dispute
- Russian officials press bilateral U.S. trade deal
- Creator of ‘Selfies at Funerals’ blog retires after Obama flub: ‘Our work here is done’
- New Obama adviser Podesta is against Keystone but will steer clear of pipeline deliberations
- 40 Australian adults, children found in ‘one of the worst accounts of incest ever made public’
- Venezuela’s Maduro calls on student ‘price vigilantes’ to hit the streets, report businesses
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
HURT: Boston on wrong side of gun-control debate
Question of the Day
BOCA GRANDE, Fla. — Some 4.5 million people around Boston cowered in their homes last week as an unknown number of heavily armed, mercilessly dangerous terrorists lurked in the dark outside, roaming the eerie stillness.
Most people were utterly defenseless and hid in their homes praying that local police or federal agents would get there before the hellbent killers who had proved their complete disdain for innocent life.
Just a glance at the thousands of security officers lining the route of the Boston Marathon earlier in the week, however, was clear evidence that no number of police can protect against all violence. It is why responsible people in Florida and other sane states own guns and know how to use them. In America, WE are the real first responders.
In Massachusetts — Boston specifically — politicians have enacted some of the toughest gun laws in the country to prevent responsible and law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves and their families from such evil. These laws, of course, apply only to those who obey laws. They do absolutely nothing to keep guns — or pressure-cooker bombs — out of the hands of terrorists who have no regard for laws.
That is why accused marathon bombers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev had no hesitation about obtaining and carrying numerous guns, according to police. Not to mention having other explosive devices that authorities are now calling “weapons of mass destruction.”
Across the country, good people watched the events unfold in Boston all week and felt sorry for their defenseless fellow Americans cowering in their homes. “Bet they wish they had a gun now,” was the common refrain.
In Washington, and especially among the smart media set, the response was the opposite. Gun laws worked so well for the people of Boston in this case that surely there will be a sudden groundswell of support for greater federal government restrictions on law-abiding gun owners.
“The news that the suspects were not authorized to own firearms will likely add fuel to calls for tougher gun laws,” The Hill newspaper reported upon learning that the suspects were in possession of illegal guns and did not have the licenses required by local laws.
A Politico journalist who apparently covers gun legislation in Washington predicted “a whole new dimension to the gun control debate” if it is proved that the terrorists obtained their illegal guns “through a loophole.”
By “loophole,” the reporter apparently meant the Tsarnaevs’ total disregard for the very gun laws that millions of responsible Americans studiously abide by every single day. Another “loophole” the terrorists attempted to exploit was the assassination of Massachusetts Institute of Technology Police Officer Sean Collier, who was shot from behind as he sat in his cruiser.
Authorities told CBS News that the brothers killed the cop because they wanted another gun. But they were unable to withdraw Officer Collier’s sidearm from his locking holster.
Only in Washington do people call the constitutional right to protect one’s family from deadly terrorists a “loophole” and then confuse that with the assassination of a cop. No wonder this country is in so much trouble.
About the Author
- HURT: Russian diplomats found socialist paradise in U.S.
- HURT: Postal Service misses address by a whole continent
- HURT: Let us all give thanks for George Mason and the Bill of Rights
- HURT: Obama is a greater threat than Toronto's crack mayor Rob Ford
- HURT: It's the Democrats, not the GOP, facing a looming civil war
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Teen thugs in D.C. run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Inside the Ring: China targets Global Hawk drone
- Obama's antics at Nelson Mandela tribute: Jovial conversation, handshake with Raul Castro
- KIBBE: Another Republican budget surrender
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whisky: U.K.-born expert
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Al Maurer provides a common sense, conservatarian, Constitutional conservative perspective from the battleground state of Colorado
Interviews and show reviews from the Los Angeles punk scene past and present. Los Angeles has always been rich in punk rock talent since punk rock was born.
Buzz on Bees is a column promoting the love and life of God’s greatest pollinators on earth: The Honeybee
Brazen, leading-edge, “call it like it is” columns and reporting from Ohio native, radio host and writer, Sara Marie Brenner.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow