- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
Leaks hurt gun control bill, Sen. Pat Toomey says
Question of the Day
“One of the things that certainly set us back is that the early leaks about a potential deal led to gross misaccurate characterizations of the legislation,” said the Pennsylvania Republican, who co-sponsored the bill with Sen. Joe Manchin III, West Virginia Democrat, on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” Wednesday. “So we spent a lot of time, Joe Manchin and I did, just setting the record straight of what was actually in the bill.
“It’s always hard to make a sale when you’re in that environment,” he said.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, last week shelved the Manchin/Toomey measure, which called for expanding background checks to all private Internet and gun show sales, after support came up five senators short of the 60 needed to clear procedural hurdles.
Mr. Toomey says he’s hopeful the bill will be brought back for a vote later this year. And with recent polls in many states showing overwhelming support for strengthening firearm background checks, he implored supporters of his bill to speak up.
“The most important thing frankly is members of Congress need to hear from people, and the people who support these background checks need to be as vocal as those who don’t,” he said. “It does not infringe any any law-abiding citizens whatsoever, and if it had I wouldn’t have supported it.
“Trying to make it harder for people who have no legal right to have a weapon to obtain it, that’s perfectly consistent with the Constitution and frankly common sense.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at email@example.com.
- GOP tests Democrats on college loan issue
- Lawmakers outside intelligence loop get miffed about briefing structure in Congress
- John Boehner: Time is right to bring latest farm bill to House floor
- Supreme Court nears rulings on key voting rights cases
- N.J. Gov. Christie picks state A.G. to fill U.S. Senate seat
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is 'torture'
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq