- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Obama has done too little, too late to fix surveillance programs, lawmakers say
Say the Snowdens of the world stay a step ahead
Question of the Day
Congressional leaders hammered President Obama on Sunday for his plan to review and potentially alter government surveillance programs.
But the changes floated by the president at a news conference Friday aren’t driving the backlash. Instead, lawmakers are taking aim at the White House’s perpetual game of catch-up, in which the national security versus privacy debate has been driven not by the administration but by figures such as National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden.
“I think Snowden came out and leaked this information and the White House has been backtracking ever since. When the story initially broke, the president went undercover,” Rep. Michael T. McCaul, Texas Republican and chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “He finally came out last Friday trying to come up with ways to salvage the program by window dressing. The problem fundamentally is he’s failed to explain these programs which are lawful, which have saved lives, which have stopped terrorist plots.”
Mr. Obama’s remarks, offered just before the first family left town for vacation, were meant to appease critics who say the federal government is slowly eroding Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights. Among other things, the president asked Congress to review portions of the Patriot Act that allow the NSA and other agencies to monitor telephone records and gather other forms of data.
The depth of those programs was first revealed by Mr. Snowden, the former government contractor recently granted asylum in Russia. He has been charged by the Justice Department with espionage and other offenses.
In addition to reviewing the Patriot Act, Mr. Obama also proposed putting privacy advocates in the courtroom to argue against the government’s case for search warrants and enhanced snooping efforts. He also said there must be greater transparency around those programs, an effort to restore skeptical Americans’ trust in their leaders.
The White House has maintained that it welcomes the debate and that the president intends to lead a national conversation on the best way to balance security and privacy.
But critics say the administration has fallen into the trap of reacting to events, such as the Snowden leaks, and the public pressure that results.
The president has “been silent for the last two months,” Rep. Peter T. King, New York Republican and a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”
“He’s allowed the Edward Snowdens and the others of the world to dominate the media, and now we have people who actually think the NSA is spying on people, is listening to our phone calls, is reading our emails,” Mr. King said.
In recent weeks, lawmakers’ voices have become louder in the larger debate.
Rep. James E. Clyburn, South Carolina Democrat, joined Republicans last month in voting to defund NSA surveillance programs. He said he did so not because he doesn’t trust the president but because he thinks Congress must be more involved.
“The president spoke out on this issue long before Snowden. And I was very comfortable with the president’s position on this,” he said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
“It’s just that every now and then, you cast a vote in order to let your constituents know, and for your colleagues to know, exactly how you feel about a situation, and sometimes, let the White House know that this is something that we cannot allow you to have just a blank check on,” he said.
Mr. Obama’s proposed changes also have drawn criticism from outside Washington, including from Mr. Snowden’s father, Lon.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- White House adviser on 2016: Rand Paul more viable than Ted Cruz
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Obama urges Congress to close corporate tax loopholes
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- Afghan who killed three U.S. Marines in 2012 to serve over 7-year prison sentence
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq