EDITORIAL: Dr. Obama’s poison pill

That’s no way to bring a sick economy back to health

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

There’s scant agreement on anything on Capitol Hill, so when a consensus comes along, the smart thing to do is seize it. Democrats and Republicans have come around to the view that Congress could kick competitiveness up a notch if it lowered the corporate income-tax rate. A bill to get this done ought to be a no-brainer, but President Obama’s agreement comes with a catch.

In his speech Tuesday at an Amazon.com distribution center in Chattanooga, Tenn., he proposed a grand bargain. “I’m willing to work with Republicans on reforming our corporate tax code,” he said, “as long as we use the money from transitioning to a simpler tax system for a significant investment in creating middle-class jobs.” In other words, he’ll concede to a rewriting of the unnecessarily complex business-tax code to lower corporate tax rates and to close corporate tax loopholes as long as the new revenues go toward “investment.” That’s his code word for blowing it all on something big and expensive.

We’ve tried this before. When Mr. Obama assumed office in 2009, Congress spent $831 billion on a stimulus package that didn’t stimulate. Unemployment is still high, and it would be higher if a lot of people hadn’t given up. A Mercatus Center survey identifies one of the reasons the stimulus didn’t stimulate is that most companies took the money and poached skilled employees from other companies. This did nothing to take people out of the unemployment line.

Congressional Democrats finally understand that they eventually must do something about it. After six years of Obamanomics, they know they’ll have a hard time blaming President Bush (or even Herbert Hoover) for the sorry state of the economy. That’s why many Democrats have warmed to the idea of reducing the corporate rate. At 40 percent, U.S. businesses pay more to the tax man than businesses in any other major industrial country. Japan is well into a second decade of what’s called the “Lost Decade.” Two years ago, it began to do something about it, dropping the corporate-tax rate from 41 percent to 38 percent.

The rest of the industrialized world has followed. Companies in Canada pay 26 percent (down from 36 percent), while the overall average in Europe is 21 percent. Even countries with not-so-free economies have lower rates: China’s is 25 percent (down from 33 percent), and Russia’s top rate is just 20 percent (down from 24 percent). Our 40 percent rate tells businessmen they’re better off setting up shop somewhere else.

Under the pressure of his re-election campaign, Mr. Obama proposed a corporate-rate cut without the spending strings attached. His new demand suggests that he was never serious about it, because Republicans in the House will never add more billions to the $3.8 trillion a year the government is already spending. The president says he’s willing to attend the patient only if he can bring his poison pills with him. That’s not very reassuring.

The Washington Times

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts