- Army’s 3-D printed bombs will create ‘a whole new universe’ of deadly capabilities
- Hamas calls on Hezbollah to join in fight against Israel
- Senators to FIFA, others: Don’t reward Putin with the World Cup in 2018
- U.S. condemns Israeli shelling of shelter in Gaza
- Obamacare shoots premiums up by 88 percent in California
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Obama to Republicans: ‘Stop just hatin’ all the time’
- U.S. chemical sites vulnerable despite millions spent on security: Congress
- Driverless cars to hit the British streets by 2015
- GOP presses to scrap IRS commissioner position — but put in panel
Political quagmire stymies military sex-assault solutions
Question of the Day
It has been looming for months, but Congress‘ debate over how to deal with sexual assaults in the U.S. military could get lost in the end-of-year shuffle as Senate Democrats find themselves with little time to tackle the budget, presidential nominations and a host of other major priorities.
The Senate began the debate in November as part of its annual defense policy bill, but the sprawling measure got mired in a dispute between Republicans and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, over how many amendments he would allow for votes.
The amendments dealing with revamping the military’s sexual assault policy got caught in the pileup, and those involved in the debate said it’s doubtful things will improve when the Senate returns for a two-week end-of-year sprint.
“Given the actions two weeks ago, I think the outlook doesn’t look great for additional amendment votes, but it’s still something we’d like to see and something we’ll still push for,” said Drew Pusateri, a spokesman for Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat.
Sexual assault is one of the most high-profile problems facing the military today. Officials worry that many victims do not report the crimes for fear of retaliation from peers and superiors.
The National Defense Authorization Act was supposed to be the vehicle for writing a solution.
Ms. McCaskill has proposed a policy that would restrict some of a commander’s authority to overturn a jury conviction, would require convicted service members to be dishonorably discharged and would mandate independent review of a case if a commander decides not to prosecute it.
But a proposal from Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand, New York Democrat, would go further by stripping military commanders of their ability to prosecute serious military crimes, including sexual assault. Instead, independent, impartial prosecutors would make the decision to pursue a case, preventing retaliation by bosses and peers.
When the Senate reconvenes, he said, the group will use social media, mail and telephone campaigns to highlight victims’ stories for lawmakers.
“For us, the longer the bill has been off the floor, the longer it’s provided us to share things like this with offices,” he said. “If the NDAA is delayed again, or if NDAA moves forward without the Gillibrand amendment attached, these are the kinds of conversations we’ll continue to have.”
Last month, the Gillibrand amendment was short of the 60 votes needed to pass. Still, Mr. Jacob said, it’s important to get a vote as soon as possible. Even if it fails, it will give lobbyists more information to use in next year’s push and send a message to the military and the country that Congress takes the issue seriously, he said.
“There’s been such little legislation that’s happened this year that what has come to the floor for a vote, it generally does because it’s an important issue,” he said. “To bring it to the floor for a vote is to recognize the importance of the issue and the importance of military justice reform.”
The House this year passed its defense policy bill, which includes provisions to combat military sexual assault, including stripping commanders of their ability to overturn jury convictions and mandate dishonorable discharge for those convicted, similar to Ms. McCaskill’s proposal.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Jacqueline Klimas covers Capitol Hill for The Washington Times. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Rep. Jeff Miller: 'Ain't no leash for VA'
- Newly confirmed VA chief greeted with lawsuit over military sex assault treatment
- Robert McDonald confirmed as VA secretary
- Lawmakers to vote on $17 billion VA compromise bill
- Pelosi: Obama's leadership on Israel is 'strong'
Latest Blog Entries
- Miss. GOP chair: Huckabee distracting from GOP's reasonable pro-life stance
- Commerce Secretary 'optimistic' about U.S.'s economic standing worldwide
- Less than half of registered voters would re-elect their congressman, poll finds
- Half of registered voters in Va. would re-elect Sen. Mark Warner
- 2013 was second most polarizing year of Obama's presidency
TWT Video Picks
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Patent workers paid to exercise, shop, do chores: report
- Proving A Point: Redskins' Bacarri Rambo vows to make impact in second year
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- Obama mum on where illegal immigrant children are sheltered
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world