- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
Obama admin. easing contraception mandate in health law
But some pro-life groups still unhappy
The Obama administration on Friday rolled out a revised rule that gives religious institutions the option to divorce themselves from a mandate in the president’s health care law that requires insurance plans to cover contraception for their employees.
The original regulation sparked a political uproar and dozens of lawsuits from religious organizations and private businesses, who said the mandate would force them to violate their religious and moral principles or face legal and financial penalties.
The new proposal from Department of Health and Human Services would allow religious nonprofits such as hospitals and universities that object to the mandate to receive an accommodation that still provides their employees separate contraceptive coverage with no co-pays, “but at no cost to the religious organization.”
Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, a deputy director at the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, said that, under the proposed rule, “insurance companies — not churches or other religious organizations — will cover contraceptive services.”
But early reaction to the new rule was mixed, with pro-choice groups hailing the language while those who opposed the original mandate either noncommittal or still unhappy with the new plan.
The Alliance Defending Freedom, a self-described “legal ministry” that is litigating several of the corporate cases, said Mr. Obama’s gesture on Friday fell short.
“All Americans, not just those in church organizations, are guaranteed freedom of conscience in their daily lives and work,” ADF senior counsel Matt Bowman said. “The administration’s narrow gesture does nothing to protect many faith-based employers or religious families from the unconstitutional abortion pill mandate.”
HHS officials envision a system in which insurance issuers or a third-party administrator — depending on whether an employer uses a group health plan or is self-insured— will offer the contraception coverage to enrollees and then see savings through a deduction in the user fees they would normally pay to be part of a state-based insurance exchange as part of Mr. Obama’s law.
Officials said issuers should also recognize savings that come from the health benefits of offering contraception.
No federal funds will be expended under the plan, although ostensibly federal and state governments will be losing out on the fees that would normally paid to participate in the exchanges, officials said. The plan will be open to comments from interested parties through April 8.
“It is important to realize these proposals are just that — proposed — and not final,” Ms. Brooks-LaSure told reporters in a conference call.
But it appeared unlikely that the new rules will placate the dozens of religious nonprofits and corporate owners that have filed lawsuits to protest the mandate contained in Mr. Obama’s sweeping new health care law, which passed in 2010 and was largely upheld by the Supreme Court last June. The plaintiffs say the use of preventive contraception or “morning-after” pills is at odds with their religious beliefs.
Defenders of the modified mandate noted Friday that religious officials and business owners will not have to use the contraceptives or pay to supply them directly to their employees.
Actual houses of worship were already exempt from the contraception mandate. Corporations, however, started to face fines this year.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Sebelius not running for Senate, HHS confirms: Report
- Red fox makes a home for himself at the White House: Report
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
- Sen. Joe Manchin keeps his options open for 2016
- Many Americans would quickly face financial hardship after losing job, poll shows
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- EDITORIAL: More Lerner smoking-gun emails at IRS
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- Former Blue Angels commander relieved of duty for alleged misconduct
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.