- Paul Walker secretly bought $9K wedding ring for Iraq vet
- Mystery sign poster hits Washington state town: ‘It’s OK to say Merry Christmas’
- Pope Francis forms commission to advise on sex abuse
- Anthony Weiner on radio? Cumulus says, ‘Never, ever’
- Executive order: Obama ups green-energy mandate on feds to 20 percent
- GOP launches candidate training: How to talk to women
- N.Y.’s Rockefeller Center lights up, as Bloomberg flicks on 76-foot Christmas tree
- Northern Ireland turns to ‘Game of Thrones’ to draw in tourists
- Washington woman live-tweets husband’s horrific car death
- China City of America mulled for New York — with $65M tax dollars
Obama admin. easing contraception mandate in health law
But some pro-life groups still unhappy
The Obama administration on Friday rolled out a revised rule that gives religious institutions the option to divorce themselves from a mandate in the president’s health care law that requires insurance plans to cover contraception for their employees.
The original regulation sparked a political uproar and dozens of lawsuits from religious organizations and private businesses, who said the mandate would force them to violate their religious and moral principles or face legal and financial penalties.
The new proposal from Department of Health and Human Services would allow religious nonprofits such as hospitals and universities that object to the mandate to receive an accommodation that still provides their employees separate contraceptive coverage with no co-pays, “but at no cost to the religious organization.”
Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, a deputy director at the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, said that, under the proposed rule, “insurance companies — not churches or other religious organizations — will cover contraceptive services.”
But early reaction to the new rule was mixed, with pro-choice groups hailing the language while those who opposed the original mandate either noncommittal or still unhappy with the new plan.
The Alliance Defending Freedom, a self-described “legal ministry” that is litigating several of the corporate cases, said Mr. Obama’s gesture on Friday fell short.
“All Americans, not just those in church organizations, are guaranteed freedom of conscience in their daily lives and work,” ADF senior counsel Matt Bowman said. “The administration’s narrow gesture does nothing to protect many faith-based employers or religious families from the unconstitutional abortion pill mandate.”
HHS officials envision a system in which insurance issuers or a third-party administrator — depending on whether an employer uses a group health plan or is self-insured— will offer the contraception coverage to enrollees and then see savings through a deduction in the user fees they would normally pay to be part of a state-based insurance exchange as part of Mr. Obama’s law.
Officials said issuers should also recognize savings that come from the health benefits of offering contraception.
No federal funds will be expended under the plan, although ostensibly federal and state governments will be losing out on the fees that would normally paid to participate in the exchanges, officials said. The plan will be open to comments from interested parties through April 8.
“It is important to realize these proposals are just that — proposed — and not final,” Ms. Brooks-LaSure told reporters in a conference call.
But it appeared unlikely that the new rules will placate the dozens of religious nonprofits and corporate owners that have filed lawsuits to protest the mandate contained in Mr. Obama’s sweeping new health care law, which passed in 2010 and was largely upheld by the Supreme Court last June. The plaintiffs say the use of preventive contraception or “morning-after” pills is at odds with their religious beliefs.
Defenders of the modified mandate noted Friday that religious officials and business owners will not have to use the contraceptives or pay to supply them directly to their employees.
Actual houses of worship were already exempt from the contraception mandate. Corporations, however, started to face fines this year.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Young millennials shun Obamacare, creating risky imbalance
- Almost 1.5 million deemed eligible for Medicaid in October alone: Obama administration
- Federal judge set to decide Obamacare battle over subsidies
- Diagnosis: Health site better, but needs work
- Lawmakers on both sides doubt Obamacare website troubles over
Latest Blog Entries
- Tensions hit boiling point over Obamacare enrollment figures, error rates
- Young, uninsured adults vital to Obamacare are not keen on enrolling: New Harvard poll
- Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox will promote Obamacare at Mall of America
- HealthCare.gov employs a new look once again
- Rep. Gwen Moore: Supreme Court needs to 'rule on the side of women'
- CURL: 'Mission Accomplished' for Obamacare
- NAPOLITANO: Liberty, the wellspring of capitalism and charity
- American teacher shot and killed at Benghazi international school
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- Democratic infighting erupts over 'we can have it all' fantasy on entitlements
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- Obama returns to class warfare as poll numbers plunge
- Pentagon may give recruits 'a shot to start over' after shameful social media posts
- HARPER: 'Knockout game' not a myth to liberal Sharpton
- Paul Walker secretly bought $9K wedding ring for Iraq vet
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness from the carpool lane.
History doesn't have to be grim; there is a lot to be learned from the pages of time.
White House pets gone wild!