- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
Fracking viewed as good; water worries remain
90% support more studies
A majority of Americans support fracking, but even larger majorities remain concerned about the drilling process’ potential impacts on drinking water quality and support more research into the practice, new polling data show.
The ORC International survey released Thursday is being trumpeted by environmental groups, which argue that it demonstrates the public remains somewhat skeptical about the safety of fracking — short for hydraulic fracturing to extract oil and natural gas — and instead favor a swift transition to renewable energy such as wind and solar power.
For example, 79 percent of those polled said they’re “concerned about fracking as it relates to water quality.”
Nearly 9 out of 10 Americans said they “support more studies of the health and environmental consequences of fracking.” Nearly 80 percent support the disclosure of chemicals used during the process, something many oil and natural gas companies already do.
“The bottom line here is that Americans are not opposed to more domestic energy production, but they are unwilling to achieve it by sacrificing clean water,” said Scott Stapf, a senior fellow at the Civil Society Institute, one of the groups that commissioned the study.
“When given a menu of choices Americans weigh our options and come down in favor of increased energy efficiency and low environmental impact,” he said.
While the public clearly wants to protect clean air and water, it also understands the value of fracking, which uses water, sand and chemical mixtures to break apart underground rock and release vast quantities of fuel.
In a Rasmussen poll from last year, 57 percent of Americans said they support the practice, which has revitalized economies in Pennsylvania among other states and also has set the U.S. on a course to be energy independent in about a decade.
A recent Siena College poll in New York, where Gov. Andrew Cuomo continues to weigh whether to allow fracking, found that 42 percent of people support the process, while 36 percent oppose it. Fifteen percent said they didn’t have enough information to make a decision.
Taken as a whole, the poll data suggest that the American public wants to see fracking used to increase domestic oil and natural gas production but also wants to see strict environmental safeguards in place. That approach is precisely the one embraced by political leaders from both sides of the aisle, including President Obama.
Environmental groups and some Democratic lawmakers also have attacked the idea of the U.S. exporting some of its ample supply of oil and gas, a notion asked about in Thursday’s survey.
Nearly two-thirds of respondents said they oppose exports until further health research is completed.
Oil and gas proponents counter that by arguing there will never be enough scientific or medical research to satisfy those who oppose fossil fuels on ideological grounds.
American Petroleum Institute President Jack Gerard said Thursday that the export of liquified natural gas, in particular, would greatly benefit the U.S. economy.
“America’s newfound abundance of natural gas resources is a boon to all domestic manufacturing through lower energy costs, lower costs on raw materials and reduced heating bills,” he said. “Restricting exports of energy makes no more sense than unnecessarily restricting the export of chemicals, agriculture products or cars, and such a backward move could violate international trade rules.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Commercial drone use not prohibited by FAA rules, judge says
- In Florida, Obama pushes federal college grants
- CPAC 2014: Democrats target convention as part of midterm-election strategy
- Obama urges Putin in phone call: De-escalate crisis in Ukraine
- Obama slaps Putin with sanctions, restrictions on visas
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- CPAC 2014: Rand Paul urges conservatives to fight for liberty
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- EDITORIAL: Connecticut revolts against gun controls that could criminalize 300,000
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Two liberals say Sarah Palin is right: Obama lacks substance
- Malaysia Airlines says plane on route to Beijing missing
- High schooler suing parents for money shot down by judge
- Soldier who hid to avoid saluting the flag to be punished in secret; Army won't release details
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again