- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
NAVARRO: March for Life celebrates 40 years
Young people the hope of the pro-life cause
On Jan. 25, hundreds of thousands of Americans will flock to Washington to mark the 40-year anniversary of the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, which declared a constitutional right to abortion while spurring a nationwide debate over existence and choice. The nation’s capital will host the March for Life at a critical time for the pro-life cause.
Noticeably absent will be Nellie Gray, founder of the event, who passed away in August. She spearheaded the movement by organizing the first march in 1974, which drew an estimated 20,000 pro-lifers. The event has since grown under her guidance, with coordinators predicting more than 400,000 marchers at this year’s rally. The Texas native took a hard-line stance on abortion, using the phrase “no exceptions, no compromise” to advise her colleagues against pursuing common ground. With respect for Gray’s tireless dedication to the unborn, pro-life advocates must begin to chart a new course as the tides of public approval drift away.
Marchers, and indeed pro-life people across the nation, face an uphill challenge as a result of the November elections. Not only did pro-life candidates across the United States struggle to retain positions and unseat incumbents, they also became immersed in national controversy. Senate candidates Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock lost their respective campaigns largely due to statements regarding rape and pregnancy that were widely perceived as thoughtless and irresponsible. The damaging comments of these two men fueled the current administration’s “war on women” charge, giving legitimacy to the idea that women’s rights are being restricted by abortion opponents.
Of course, it takes two to tango. Activism on both sides has become more rigid, more heated and more ruthless since Roe was handed down. The basic principles of the debate concerning public morality and individual freedom have become lost in the harsh tone of those defending them. Each year brings increasingly destructive rhetoric in the form of shortsighted attempts to persuade the ambivalent middle.
Workable solutions may instead be found within the hundreds of student organizations that return every year to march. The Pew Research forum last week released a report revealing that only 47 percent of people under 30 even know what the Roe decision was all about. Young people have a responsibility to keep the pro-life message alive. The next generation of pro-life activists is poised to develop approaches that serve the interests of all parties. Representing a cohort that is more tolerant and less ideological than their predecessors, young people can focus on finding ways to prevent teen pregnancy, making adoption a more accessible option and reducing conditions that lead to a high rate of abortion.
Until young people take the reins, representatives need to be responsible voices in connecting their message to the public. The pro-life platform can function more effectively with public officials who openly acknowledge that there are no easy answers. What is currently lacking in our political discourse is an ethic of respect for people with beliefs that differ from our own, which is an important aspect of the discussion. This involves the recognition that abortion is more than a rhetorical tool for political gain — the decision is a reality for women around the country.
Devoted citizens should be willing to enter the conversation with an ongoing commitment to the common good. Forty years of debate have found this to be no easy task, yet it is the cornerstone of a democratic community. If successful, the issue can be reframed to address both the limits of our circumstances and possibilities for change. That’s something we can all march for.
Ryan Navarro, 25, works in student affairs at Juniata College.
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Paul takes veiled shot at Cruz, says GOP must focus on growth
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- VIDEO: Emily Miller on Fox Business "The Independents" special "The Gun Show"
- Obama engages in Ukraine diplomacy from Fla. resort as Russia digs in
- Stolen European passports on Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777
- Gates: Obama strategy won't stop Putin
- CPAC 2014 straw poll results
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults