A presidentially appointed panel charged with ensuring federal laws don’t impede Americans’ civil liberties has nothing to show for itself in recent years, failing to meet even once during a five-year span because vacancies had left the board dormant for so long.
The federal Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board finally had enough members to meet once last fall, but it awaits a chairman, continues a search for office space in the Washington area and is still working on building its website.
It took President Obama until nearly the end of his first term to appoint members to the board, a move made only after critics called on him to fill the seats. Likewise, President Bush failed to fill vacancies on the board, which was created through a recommendation of the commission that investigated the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
The lack of a chairman raised questions about whether the board would be able to function at all, but officials insist they are working to become operational.
Officials at the board declined to discuss specific issues that the panel plans to review, but said in a written statement to The Washington Times that it is active and “plans to develop a sound understanding of critical government counterterrorism-related initiatives.”
With its first few months spent looking for office space and handling budget and personnel issues, the board said its first meeting with newly sworn-in members this fall was aimed at soliciting public input on its upcoming agenda.
Without staff, the board employs its chief administrator and legal counsel on loan from other federal agencies.
Mark Rumold, staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, one of several watchdog groups that criticized the Bush and Obama administrations for letting the board languish, said he is cautiously optimistic that the board will delve into several important civil liberties issues this year.
“It’s been five years,” he said. “I was away over the holidays and papers stacked up on my desk, so they definitely have their work cut out for them.”
“I don’t know that they’ve led to much in terms of leads in terms of combating terrorism, and what they’ve spiraled into are giant money pits and civil liberties infringement offices,” he said.
It’s unclear whether Mr. Medine’s nomination will have a better chance of moving forward in a new Senate. The White House announcement of Mr. Medine’s nomination in late 2011 listed him as a partner at the WilmerHale law firm who specialized in privacy and data security.
But even with four board members, the panel can meet and transact business. The board met for the first time on Oct. 31 when it heard from civil liberties groups urging the board to focus its attention on a range of privacy issues.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Jim McElhatton is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
As the sun sets, the day ends, thoughts crowd our minds...
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
An establishmentarian conservative, short on cash, but long on wisdom.
World's Ugliest Dog Contest
Spelling Bee finale
Marines train Afghan soldiers
Rolling Thunder 2013
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal