Everyone thought it was true, and now there is official confirmation: The 112th Congress, which came to a close last week, was the least productive on record.
Together, the House and Senate enacted the fewest laws, considered the fewest bills and held the lowest number of formal negotiations between them — all measures that helped Congress to a historic low in The Washington Times’ Legislative Futility Index, which tracks floor activity in both chambers.
Congress notched a Futility Index of 330 — making it nearly 10 percent worse than the previous low, set by the 107th Congress in 2001 and 2002. That also happened to be the last time Democrats held the Senate and Republicans controlled the House, which was the same division of power in the 112th Congress.
“There is less willingness to find common ground in things,” said former Rep. Steven C. LaTourette, an Ohio Republican who resigned, citing partisanship. “We didn’t used to fight about everything, and today we fight about everything.”
Those fights have slowed the legislative machinery dramatically.
At its peaks, Congress adopted more than 200 conference reports in a two-year session, the Senate met for nearly 3,000 hours while the House met for nearly 2,500 hours, and the chambers combined to enact more than 1,000 laws.
But in 2011 and 2012, Congress produced just 10 conference reports, the Senate met for little more than 2,000 hours and the House for 1,700, and the two chambers combined to enact fewer than 230 laws.
Republicans blame politics.
Democrats blame the Republicans’ ability to use obstructionist tools such as the filibuster, saying that has made it impossible to even begin debating many bills.
“The Senate is not working,” Sen. Tom Udall, New Mexico Democrat, said last week as he introduced a package of rules changes that would strip away one of the two chances the minority has to filibuster Senate bills.
She said party leaders increasingly write bills themselves rather than send them through the committee process, and bring them to the floor to set up partisan battles. Meanwhile, rank-and-file members are engaged in continual campaigns where they are asked to draw sharp distinctions with the other party — a bad setup for coming together later to pass legislation.
“By accommodating the schedule to the campaign, and by accommodating the content of legislation to political messaging, you’re going to have less legislation,” Ms. Nickels said. “They’re not going to be here that much and the leaders are going to be shaping the bills that they have to vote on, because the leaders are looking at the bills in terms of a political context.”View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Stephen Dinan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A carefully guided tour through the confusing world of modern bookselling and publishing.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall