- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
House votes to ban abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy
Question of the Day
House Republicans powered through a bill Tuesday to ban abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, saying the recent conviction of a Philadelphia abortion provider for killing newborn babies has revived the contentious debate.
GOP lawmakers said Kermit Gosnell’s trial raised tricky questions about what the cutoff should be for abortions and at what point fetuses feel pain — but Democrats said Republicans will suffer with voters who think the party ignores women’s concerns
The bill, which passed by a 228-196 vote, marked this Congress‘ first foray into pro-life issues.
“I am appalled by the savage practice of late-term abortion,” said Rep. Michele Bachmann, Minnesota Republican, as she stood next to an ultrasound photo of a 20-week-old fetus on the House floor.
Under the bill, a woman is exempt from the 20-week threshold only if her life is threatened or the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest and she has reported either incident before obtaining the abortion.
The Democrat-controlled Senate is unlikely to take up the measure, and President Obama said he would veto the “assault on a woman’s right to choose.”
Bill supporters said repeatedly that they were motivated by what prosecutors had called Gosnell’s “house of horrors.” Gosnell was convicted of murder in the deaths of three babies he delivered after botched abortions.
The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Trent Franks, Arizona Republican, said Tuesday that the Gosnell case put a face on the issue of late-term abortion, and his legislation marked the first time either chamber of Congress provided “affirmative protection to the unborn child.”
“Nobody takes the issue of abortion lightly, but unfortunately not enough attention is being paid to the unborn child,” said Rep. Virginia Foxx, North Carolina Republican.
But Democrats said the bill smacked of a repeat of the 2012 GOP campaign, which Democrats said amounted to a “war on women.” It was highlighted by two GOP candidates who lost their November bids for the Senate after they made comments on pregnancy resulting from rape.
Democrats said the GOP was once again treading on touchy ground.
“First of all, it’s the woman’s body, not yours,” said Rep. Frederica S. Wilson, Florida Democrat. “She alone bears the burden, the pain and joy that it brings. Please stop trying to regulate our reproductive organs. They belong to us.”
Last year, the House passed a similar bill, though that applied only to the District of Columbia, which is under Congress‘ direct control. After the Gosnell murder trial, Mr. Franks expanded his legislation to cover the country.
The bill’s supporters cited a growing body of scientific evidence that has developed in the 40 years since the Supreme Court upheld a woman’s right to an abortion in its landmark case, Roe v. Wade, that shows fetuses can feel pain at 20 weeks post-fertilization.
House Democrats said that is a fringe view among the medical community. Republicans, they said, did not provide broad enough exemptions for women who become pregnant because of rape and incest because many of them may be afraid to report the incidents.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- House panel OKs resolution to sue president for Obamacare delays
- Contrasting judgments on Obama's health care hours apart; appeals court calls subsidies unlawful
- New Democratic caucus will pressure GOP governors to expand Medicaid
- Insurers cough up refunds to subscribers under Obamacare ‘80-20 rule’
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Afghan who killed three U.S. Marines in 2012 to serve over 7-year prison sentence
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq