New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s ban on big sugary sodas fell flat Monday after a state judge invalidated the rule.
“The court finds that the regulation herein is laden with exceptions based on economic and political concerns,” the judge wrote in his 36-page opinion.
Since its conception, Mr. Bloomberg’s bid to regulate consumption of sugary drinks to help fend off the city’s climbing obesity rates has been criticized as an example of a government “nanny state” run amok while becoming a focus of jokes by late-night television talk shows and radio hosts.
Still, the New York ban had inspired similar proposals in cities and states across the country.
A coalition of labor unions, along with theater, beverage and grocery trade associations and the New York Statewide Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, filed a request for a permanent restraining order in October.
“The court ruling provides a sigh of relief to New Yorkers and thousands of small businesses in New York City that would have been harmed by this arbitrary and unpopular ban,” the American Beverage Association said in a Monday statement. “With this ruling behind us, we look forward to collaborating with city leaders on solutions that will have a meaningful and lasting impact on the people of New York City.”
But Mr. Bloomberg said he would appeal the decision and predicted that the rule ultimately would pass judicial muster, describing the city’s board of health as a “pioneer” and noting that the federal government ultimately followed the board on decisions such as banning lead paint.
“We have a responsibility as human beings to do something, to save each other,” Mr. Bloomberg said after the ruling. “While other people will wring their hands over the problem of sugary drinks, in New York City, we’re doing something about it.”
The rule bans certain venues, including restaurants, theaters and sports parks, from serving sugary drinks in containers larger than 16 ounces. At the same time, other venues such as convenience stores and supermarkets are exempt from the restriction.
“[I]t applies to some but not all food establishments in the city, it excludes other beverages that have significantly higher concentrations of sugar sweetener and/or calories on suspect grounds, and the loopholes inherent in the rule, including but not limited to no limitations on refills, defeat and/or serve to gut the purpose of the rule,” Mr. Tingling wrote.
The judge also said the ban should have been approved by the elected City Council, instead of the city health board, whose members are appointed by the mayor.
Mr. Bloomberg, acting with the New York City Department of Health, argued that the cap on drink sizes was needed to combat an “obesity epidemic” in New York City. Attorneys for the city argued in their brief that 57.5 percent of adults and 40 percent of children living in the city are overweight or obese, while more than a half-million residents suffer from diabetes.
Dr. Thomas Farley, commissioner of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, said in a statement that the judge’s decision “threatens the health of New Yorkers.”
The department estimates that care for obesity-related illnesses in the city costs government health programs as much as $2.8 billion annually.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A carefully guided tour through the confusing world of modern bookselling and publishing.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention