MESSER: The budget road less traveled

House plan is a smarter way forward for America

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

The iconic American poet Robert Frost wrote that “two roads diverged in a wood, and I, I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.” The House and Senate recently put forward two very different budget paths for our country to follow. One meets the challenges we face head-on by making responsible choices. The other puts off tough decisions and continues business as usual.

The House budget plan will put us on a path to prosperity. The plan would balance the budget in 10 years, while modestly increasing spending by 3.5 percent a year over the next decade. The sensible spending controls and much-needed reforms would still allow for significant investments on important priorities.

Importantly, the House plan would lower taxes so people can keep more of their hard-earned money and would repeal the president’s health care law so employers won’t be taxed out of business. The plan also calls for modest reforms to Medicare to protect the programs for current recipients and save it for our children.

The Senate budget plan will put us on the wrong road. Their plan — the first one they’ve put forward in more than four years — raises taxes by $1 trillion, not to balance the budget, but to allow the government to continue its unrestrained spending. It calls for more spending, more borrowing and more debt, which will relegate our children and grandchildren to a future less prosperous than ours. The Senate plan never balances and spends $5 trillion more than the House plan over the next 10 years.

Which path should we choose?

The Senate plan changes very little. It keeps us on a path where the economy just isn’t working for too many Americans. It’s a path where good jobs are hard to find, where gas and groceries cost too much, where taxes are too high, and where paychecks aren’t going as far as they used to. It’s a path that ignores the fact that Medicare and Social Security are going broke just as retiring baby boomers need those programs the most.

The House plan takes a path less frequented by politicians. It’s a path where we don’t promise everything to everyone. It’s a path that controls spending sensibly so we can spend the limited resources we have on the programs we need. It’s a path toward lower taxes, where people get to keep more of their hard-earned money, and where the government lives within its means so future generations can escape crushing debt.

People are really hurting in this economy and need help now. The House budget calls for making decisions that will lead to a healthier economy today and a much brighter future for every American. The Senate budget calls for more of the same. Which road we choose will make all the difference.

Rep. Luke Messer, Indiana Republican, serves on the House Budget Committee.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts