- Man arrested in car bomb plot at Kansas airport
- Prison inmates take up ‘Knockout’ game, target female officers
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- John Kerry: Israel-Palestinian peace deal paved for April
- India diplomat who touts women’s rights busted for $3 wage to nanny
- MSNBC host Ed Schultz paid $252K by unions in 2012-2013
- Korean War memorial ordered to take down Christian cross
- Billy Graham near death, ‘close to going home to be with the Lord’
- SeaTac, Wash.: City’s new $15 minimum wage heads to court
- Obama mulls support for Islamists in Syria, with conditions
Marshals lost track of terror suspects in witness protection
The U.S. Marshals Service lost track of two “known or suspected terrorists” being held by the federal government as part of its witness protection program, the Justice Department’s office of inspector general said Thursday in a report.
Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz, in the public summary of an interim report, said the two terrorists were able to flee the country — one later discovered to be living outside of the U.S. and the other also is likely outside the country.
Until his office raised concerns, Mr. Horowitz said other terrorists in the Witness Security Program, known as WitSec, who also were on the government’s “no-fly list” were able to board airplanes and to “evade one of the government’s primary means of identifying and tracking terrorists’ movements and actions” through the new identities the government had provided them.
As part of the WitSec program, the Justice Department had given new names and identities to the known or suspected terrorists despite being on the Transportation Security Administration’s no-fly list.
“We identified some WitSec program participants who were on the TSA’s No Fly list yet were allowed to fly on commercial flights with WitSec program officials’ knowledge and approval,” the report said. “Moreover, these individuals, on their own accord, could have flown without WitSec program officials’ knowledge and approval.”
The report’s release caps a week of bad news for the Obama administration, in which it came under fire over the Justice Department’s subpoena of the telephone records of at least 20 editors and reporters at The Associated Press; renewed charges of a suspected cover-up involving the White House’s response to the Benghazi attack; and information that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.
In his report, Mr. Horowitz said his office also discovered that the Justice Department “did not definitively know how many known or suspected terrorists” had been admitted to the program and failed to provide the names of some of the terrorists it held to the government’s Terrorist Screening Center.
The Terrorist Screening Center maintains a watch list that’s used to keep dangerous people off airline flights.
In a statement, the Justice Department said the WitSec program for more than 40 years has enabled the government to bring to justice the most dangerous criminals by providing protection for witnesses fearing for their safety.
Over the past two decades, the department said, the program had helped thwart attacks and aided the prosecution of those responsible for some of the worst acts of terrorism in American history, including the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City and the 2009 New York City subway suicide-bomb plot.
“In the 40-year history of the WitSec program, no terrorism-linked witness has ever committed a single act of terrorism after entering the program,” Armando O. Bonilla, senior counsel to the deputy attorney general, wrote in a reply memo.
The department also said that the number of former known or suspected terrorists admitted into the WitSec Program represents a fraction of 1 percent of the total WitSec population, and the vast majority were admitted prior to Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
It said witnesses are admitted only if relevant federal law enforcement officials have determined they are suitable for the program and the need to admit the witness outweighs the risk to the public.
Mr. Bonilla also said the universe of known or suspected terrorists is a small part of the witness protection program, but is a necessary balancing act.
“The government generally cannot choose its witnesses,” Mr. Bonilla wrote. “This is particularly true in cases involving terrorism, where our witnesses are often former known or suspected terrorists, or individuals who are close enough to terrorists to have information about them, their organizations and their plans, but whose cooperation is necessary to successfully prosecute those who post the most significant threat to our national security.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Jerry Seper is the investigative editor for The Washington Times.
- With bombs away, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants make their play
- Medical-device company exec admits to bilking shareholders of $400M
- Justice Dept: Florida's disabled children unnecessarily put in nursing facilities
- Man gets 11 years in Philadelphia mob crackdown
- Eric Holder asks for respect from protesters of George Zimmerman verdict
Latest Blog Entries
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- U.S. Navy-China showdown: Chinese try to halt U.S. cruiser in international waters
- 'Active shooter' injures two at Colo. school; gunman on the loose
- Obama birther theories float as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- Billy Graham near death, close to going home to be with the Lord
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- North Korea's official report on Jang Song Thaek
- House budget bargain faces Senate filibuster; Republicans line up to oppose
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Musings of a bilingual, agnostic, combat veteran and jewelry maker.
Topics will include politics, religion, race, culture, and anything else that needs to be discussed...
Our Choice: Individual responsibility and self-government or the abandonment of the American Revolution
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow