- JetBlue pilots vote to unionize; 2 previous attempts failed
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with ‘full-time’ robots
- Navy’s military dolphins may meet Putin’s porpoises in Black Sea
- Forget the Porsche — it’s the guy with the Prius that attracts the ladies, poll shows
- Fired Russian Facebook CEO says site has fallen in the hands of pro-Putin supporters
- Sen. Boozman of Arkansas has emergency heart surgery
- Brazil embraces drones to save the Amazon rain forest
- Teen stowaway shows holes in vast airport security
- Supreme Court to decide if passports can say ‘Jerusalem, Israel’
- Cries of anguish as South Korea ferry toll tops 100
Deadline set for James Cole to detail Eric Holder’s recusal
Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole has until the end of business Friday to tell a House committee how and when his boss, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., recused himself in the Justice Department’s subpoena of two months of telephone records of at least 20 reporters and editors at The Associated Press.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, Virginia Republican, and Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., Wisconsin Republican who leads the panel’s subcommittee on crime, terrorism, homeland security and investigations, want to know whether Mr. Holder committed perjury when he told the committee under oath May 15 he knew AP had secretly been targeted but he was “not familiar with the way the subpoena had been structured.”
Mr. Holder testified that his knowledge of sensitive information in the case made him a potential leaker and required that he remove himself from the probe. He said he was interviewed by the FBI in the AP leak.
During an often rancorous Judiciary Committee hearing, Mr. Holder said the AP subpoena was approved by Mr. Cole in the search for the source of a leak of national security information that described a foiled terrorist plot in Yemen. He said that while the leak was “very, very serious” and had “put the American people at risk,” he did not remember when he recused himself from the investigation, did not put his recusal in writing, and never told the White House.
In their letter, Mr. Goodlatte and Mr. Sensenbrenner asked Mr. Cole to document what day Mr. Holder had recused himself from the investigation; to explain how Mr. Cole learned of the recusal; to say whether Mr. Holder had specifically told Mr. Cole of his intent to recuse himself from the inquiry; and to say whether the recusal was made in writing or memorialized in any manner.
The lawmakers also asked Mr. Cole to say whether every Justice Department official or employee who had information on the foiled terrorist plot recused himself; whether every department official or employee interviewed by the FBI in connection with the investigation recused himself; whether Mr. Cole possessed the improperly disclosed information; and, if so, whether he was interviewed by the FBI in connection with this investigation.
“If you do possess the information at issue in this investigation, why were you not required to also recuse yourself?” the letter asks.
The letter says the Justice Department issued subpoenas for several telephone lines accessible to and used by a large number of reporters, and asks what steps the department took, if any, to narrow the scope of the telephone toll records request to ensure that only those records made by the subject reporters and staff were obtained.
The Justice Department also issued subpoenas for a telephone line located in the House of Representatives Press Gallery.
“Are there any statutes, regulations or internal Justice Department policies applicable to requests for telephone toll records for a telephone located inside the U.S. Capitol complex, even if such telephone line is paid for by a media outlet?” the letter asks.
The letter also noted that at the House oversight hearing, Mr. Holder “repeatedly stated” he could not answer questions about the subpoenas because he “lacked any knowledge of the investigation due to his recusal.”
“As acting attorney general for this investigation, you are in the best position to answer our questions in this matter,” it said.
In July 2012, he told House Speaker John A. Boehner the Justice Department would take no action in response to a Contempt of Congress citation brought against Mr. Holder for his refusal to turn over documents requested as part of a House oversight investigation into the botched “Fast and Furious” gunrunning investigation.
In a letter to the House speaker, Mr. Cole said Mr. Holder’s refusal to turn over Fast and Furious documents sought under subpoena did not constitute a crime and, as a result, the department would not bring the contempt citation before a grand jury “or take any other action to prosecute the attorney general.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- With bombs away, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants make their play
- Medical-device company exec admits to bilking shareholders of $400M
- Justice Dept: Florida's disabled children unnecessarily put in nursing facilities
- Man gets 11 years in Philadelphia mob crackdown
- Eric Holder asks for respect from protesters of George Zimmerman verdict
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Feds who send arms against ranch families betray American values
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, renegade
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- IRS revokes conservative group's tax-exempt status over anti-Clinton statements: report
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Michelle Obama: Obama family Sundays are more for napping than church
- Supreme Court upholds Michigan affirmative action ban
- Supreme Court seems skeptical of Ohio law to police campaign 'lies'
- Kerry accuses Moscow of fomenting Ukraine unrest
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.