- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
- U.N. warns of Muslim ‘cleansing’ in Central African Republic
- Senate blocks change to military sex assault cases
- Drug mix may have cured child born with HIV, doctors say
- De Blasio’s wife irks former mansion chef with ‘servant’ remark
- Russia’s neighbors shiver amid Putin’s Cold War moves in Ukraine
- New SAT: The essay portion is to become optional
- Military group can’t march to honor the fallen at Boston Marathon due to security changes
- Senate passes bills deleting ‘retarded’ from laws
- China announces biggest military hike in 3 years: We are not ‘boy scouts with spears’
Lawmakers can’t find abortion-free health care exchanges, push transparency bill
Rep. Christopher H. Smith and a bipartisan pro-life coalition in Congress say the Obama administration is obfuscating consumers about the health care law by not making it clear which exchange plans cover abortion and which don’t.
Mr. Smith, New Jersey Republican, and others said it is also nearly impossible to determine whether a plan imposes a surcharge for covering abortion services, a complaint that adds to mounting concerns over the rocky rollout of insurance markets tied to the Affordable Care Act.
A half-dozen House members, including Rep. Daniel Lipinski, Illinois Democrat, introduced a bill Wednesday to promote transparency on the exchanges because they fear government funds will pay for abortion in violation of the Hyde Amendment, a long-standing provision that bars the use of federal funds to pay for the procedure except in cases of rape or incest or to save the life of the mother.
“The inauguration of the Obamacare exchanges reveals that many health insurance plans throughout the nation will subsidize abortion on demand, even late-term abortions,” Mr. Smith said.
The exchanges are online portals where Americans without employer-based coverage can seek private health care plans, often with the help of income-based government subsidies.
The markets debuted Oct. 1 but have been plagued by long wait times and computer glitches. Administration officials say the exchanges are getting better by the day, but Republican critics — on Wednesday alone — deemed the implementation to be a “fiasco,” “train wreck” and “unmitigated disaster.”
The administration faced fresh questions about the law’s viability Wednesday amid multiple news reports that officials had been warned about major design and technical flaws in the online system to sign up people for the state-based health insurance exchanges that debuted at the beginning of the month.
Mr. Smith’s bill would require qualified health care plans on the exchanges to prominently display information about abortion coverage in marketing materials, plan comparison tools or a summary of benefits. They also must disclose whether the plan charges a surcharge to cover the cost of abortion coverage, a fee that Mr. Smith said is typically at least $1 per month for millions of customers.
“Without this legislation, millions of Americans are likely to be unknowingly enrolled in health plans that include abortion coverage,” said Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List.
Congressional Democrats and President Obama have shown little appetite to alter the president’s signature health care law, and the administration Wednesday offered a different take from Mr. Smith’s on how the law treats abortion coverage.
Officials at the Department of Health and Human Services said the overhaul does not allow federal funds to be used for elective abortion, but does allow individuals to purchase such coverage with their own money.
Sponsors of the bill said their staffers found it difficult to extract information about abortion coverage in general from exchanges in multiple states. Exchange staff said consumers had to pick a plan first or check, one by one, with each insurance carrier.
Mr. Smith circulated a “dear colleague” letter Wednesday to highlight the issue and discuss his staff’s findings, including that the exchanges for Connecticut and Rhode Island “do not have a single plan that excludes elective abortion.”
Sponsors of the bill say there should be little opposition to what amounts to a right-to-know bill that lends transparency to health care, a concept Mr. Obama pushed when the act was approved in 2010.
“This should not be a partisan issue,” said Rep. Diane Black, Tennessee Republican. “This should be common sense.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Tax-prep firms pitch in, cash in on Obamacare
- Obama tries to reassure Hispanics on Obamacare
- Half of uninsured look to Obamacare exchanges for coverage
- Another Obamacare deadline moved: Non-compliant plans get 2-year extension
- House votes to delay Obamacare individual mandate
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Aronofsky's 'Noah' banned in Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates
- Christine O'Donnell eager to re-engage in political debate
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- DELAY: A revolution for the Constitution
- PRUDEN: Likening Putin to Hitler on Ukraine shows Hillary's shaky grasp of history
- Back to the Future: HUVr Tech marketing video goes viral with hoverboard release tease
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again