- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
- CDC sees measles spike and ‘failure to vaccinate’
Freeze! Global gun grab treaty ‘dead in the water,’ Inhofe says
Opponents fear international pact’s fallout
Secretary of State John F. Kerry on Wednesday formally signed a far-reaching international treaty in New York designed to regulate the international purchase and sale of conventional firearms — despite intense resistance from the American gun lobby and warnings from at least one Republican that the pact will never get ratified in Washington.
The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty requires signatories to draw up national regulations to control the transfer of conventional arms and components and to regulate arms brokers, but drafters insist it will not control the domestic firearms market in any country. It prohibits the transfer of conventional weapons if they violate international arms embargoes or if they go to regimes accused of genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes.
In notifying lawmakers of the plan to proceed forth with signing the treaty, the Obama administration drew harsh criticism from Sen. James M. Inhofe, Oklahoma Republican, who claimed the treaty is “already dead in the water in the Senate.”
“The administration is wasting precious time trying to sign away our laws to the global community and unelected U.N. bureaucrats,” Mr. Inhofe said, asserting that his own push against the treaty in March revealed that the Obama administration was far short of the 67 votes needed to ratify the treaty.
“Fifty-three senators from both parties went on the record and voted against the treaty, meaning the president does not have the majority for ratification,” Mr. Inhofe said in his statement.
Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also warned the administration against trying to implement any provisions of the treaty before the Senate can vote.
“The [treaty] raises significant legislative and constitutional questions. Any act to implement this treaty, provisionally or otherwise, before the Congress provides its advice and consent would be inconsistent with the United States Constitution, law, and practice,” Mr. Corker said Tuesday.
The administration appeared uninterested in such claims Tuesday, circulating a statement attributable to a “senior State Department official” who said the U.S. had announced its intention to sign the Arms Trade Treaty “months ago.”
The treaty “merely helps other countries create and enforce the kind of strict national export controls the United States has had in place for decades which haven’t diminished one iota the ability of Americans to enjoy their rights under our Constitution,” the unnamed official said.
But a political fight over the treaty’s ratification looms, with fierce resistance anticipated from the American gun lobby — a reality the National Rifle Association made known in May, when the Obama administration first signaled its intention to sign the agreement.
At the time, the Institute for Legislative Action — the self-described “lobbying arm” of the NRA — asserted that the treaty threatens “the rights and privacy of American gun owners.”
“Signatories will be encouraged to keep information on the ‘end users’ of arms imported into their territory and supply such information to the exporting country,” the NRA-ILA posting said. “Exporting nations, nearly all of which have civilian firearm control regimes far harsher than the U.S., will be encouraged to take the firearm control laws of an importing country into account before approving a transfer of arms.”
Supporters of the treaty claim it will help Western powers control the dangerous flow of weapons to despotic leaders, terrorists and criminal gangs in various corners of the world. Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan on Tuesday told the Reuters news agency that for the nations of Africa, illegally traded weapons “are the weapons of mass destruction.”
Nigeria has been repeatedly attacked during recent years by the shadowy, cross-border Islamic jihadist militant group Boko Haram, whose activities, according to Mr. Jonathan, are “sustained by unfettered access by non-state actors to illicit smart arms and light weapons,” the Reuters report said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Guy Taylor rejoined The Washington Times in 2011 as the State Department correspondent.
As a freelance journalist, Taylor’s work was supported by the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting and the Fund For Investigative Journalism, and his stories appeared in a variety publications, from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch to Salon, Reason, Prospect Magazine of London, the Daily Star of Beirut, the ...
- U.S., Chinese diplomats talk air defense zone ahead of Biden visit
- State mulling whether to invite Iran to upcoming Syria talks
- Election strengthens Honduran military's hand
- U.S. B-52 bombers buzz China's expanded airspace as dispute with Japan escalates
- Obama defends Iran nuclear deal, attacks critics for 'bluster'
Latest Blog Entries
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- New battlefront emerges in war between Republicans, tea party
- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on 'outdated' agencies
- Budget negotiators look to federal workers for benefit concessions
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
Political satirist and Christian apologist Bob Siegel discusses religion and politics.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
White House pets gone wild!