- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
Iranian president brushes away Obama’s olive branch at U.N.
Hasan Rouhani turns attention away from nuclear buildup
UNITED NATIONS — President Obama used his annual address to the United Nations on Tuesday to say he sees an opening for diplomacy with Iran and would pursue a deal to stop the Islamic republic’s pursuit of nuclear weapons — but his words were soon overshadowed by the handshake that wasn’t.
New Iranian President Hasan Rouhani rejected a White House invitation for a brief meeting with Mr. Obama, an American olive branch designed to move the two countries beyond their adversarial positions and toward peace. The administration later claimed that Iranian officials thought it was “too complicated” to be seen meeting with the U.S. and that the conversation, no matter how short, would have posed political problems back home for Mr. Rouhani.
Hours after the snub, the Iranian leader took to the U.N. stage and, while expressing openness to diplomacy with the U.S., blasted “warmongers” around the world and stated flatly that “Iran poses absolutely no threat to the world or the region.”
The whirlwind day — which included a late-afternoon briefing by senior White House officials to defend their invite to Mr. Rouhani — has diverted much of the attention away from Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The spotlight instead shifted to the prospect of a face-to-face meeting between the presidents.
That, analysts say, is exactly what Iran wanted.
“Power politics is much more exciting than nuclear physics. Rouhani’s play is to obscure the nuclear physics behind a cloud of personalities and pieties, because who really wants to sit down and go through the excruciating detail of the dangers of Iran” and its growing nuclear capability, said Mark Dubowitz, executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
He said Mr. Rouhani is “counting on” being able to turn attention away from his country’s nuclear ambitions and to the man-to-man interactions — or lack thereof — between himself and Mr. Obama.
That surely was not what Mr. Obama envisioned when he spoke Tuesday morning. He delivered a lengthy, wide-ranging address focused on a variety of international issues. He had harsh words for the United Nations regarding Syria, saying a resolution is needed to call for military action if Syrian President Bashar Assad does not give up his chemical weapons stockpile, as he has agreed to do.
Failing to hold Mr. Assad accountable, he said, essentially would render the United Nations irrelevant.
Mr. Obama also tackled the sensitive subject of Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, vowing to help foster talks between the two sides. He met Tuesday afternoon with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, and is scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington next week.
But it was Mr. Obama’s words on Iran that drew the most scrutiny Tuesday; they served as the precursor to the meeting flap that would come later in the day.
“President Rouhani has just recently reiterated that the Islamic republic will never develop a nuclear weapon. These statements … should offer the basis for a meaningful agreement,” Mr. Obama said. “We should be able to achieve a resolution that respects the rights of the Iranian people, while giving the world confidence that the Iranian [nuclear] program is peaceful. To succeed, conciliatory words have to be matched by actions that are transparent and verifiable.”
On Capitol Hill, lawmakers echoed Mr. Obama’s sentiments, saying that merely talking to the Iranians means little in the grand scheme.
“We need to approach the current diplomatic initiative with eyes wide open, and we must not allow Iran to use negotiations as a tool of delay and deception,” said a joint statement from Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire.
In his own speech later Tuesday, Mr. Rouhani — elected largely on a platform of more moderate foreign policy — sounded in some respects eerily similar to his immediate predecessor, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- What will a grandchild mean for Hillary?
- What will a grandchild mean for Hillary Clinton?
- Obama to tour site of Washington mudslide
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
- Joe Biden's biggest gaffe: VP blowing his 2016 head start
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.