- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Golden Hammer: Army wing office buy doesn’t fly for waste watchers
Question of the Day
Like paying for a car repair you don’t need, the Army dished out $8 million for helicopter parts it wasn’t going to use, the service’s own investigators say.
The Army’s Non-Standard Rotary Wing Aircraft office overhauled five Pakistani Mi-17 helicopters intended for use by the Afghan armed forces, but instead of using items already owned by the Defense Department, officials bought completely new parts.
Also, it turns out that the parts they did buy aren’t commonly used in repairs of the Russian-made aircraft, leaving the Pentagon with a pile of unnecessary helicopter parts and a couple of million dollars in wasted funds, the Defense Department inspector general said.
For shelling out taxpayer money to purchase unneeded helicopter parts, the U.S. Army’s Non-Standard Rotary Wing Aircraft office wins this week’s Golden Hammer, a distinction awarded by The Washington Times to examples of fiscal mismanagement and wasteful spending.
Although Army officials said they thought they performed a technical analysis to determine what parts were needed, investigators concluded that no such evaluation was conducted, so another $4.5 million was wasted on parts that weren’t going to be used for the helicopter overhauls.
The excessive purchases are the latest controversy surrounding the Non-Standard Rotary Wing Aircraft office, which oversaw the project and is in charge of dealing with helicopters not commonly used by the U.S. military. Defense Department officials say the program of purchasing and retrofitting the Russian-made helicopters is the most efficient way to supply the Afghan air force as the U.S. military prepares to leave the country by the end of next year.
Army officials said Thursday that they are still weighing their response to the inspector general’s findings.
The Reuters news service reported last week that the former head of the office, Col. Norbert E. Vergez, is facing a criminal investigation by the inspector general’s defense criminal investigative service, which is looking into accusations that Col. Vergez tried to steer business to Russian companies to which he may have had personal ties. The retired colonel now works for a New York-based private equity firm whose investments include MD Helicopters, a military and civilian helicopter maker based in Mesa, Ariz.
Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of senators wants the Pentagon to reconsider its purchases and overhauls of Mi-17 helicopters, stating in an Aug. 5 letter that the Russian arms export company that sells the aircraft also supplies weapons to Syrian President Bashar Assad, a longtime Moscow ally.
“DOD has put American taxpayers in the repugnant position of subsidizing the mass murder of Syrian civilians,” reads the letter sent from 13 senators to Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
As for the unneeded parts, investigators estimate the purchases cost the Army an extra $1.3 million above normal prices. The contracting official in charge of the purchases “did not determine a fair and reasonable price,” the inspector general said, adding that the official “did not require subcontractor competition, obtain cost and pricing data, or perform a price reasonableness determination or cost analysis.”
The inspector general said it wants a complete inventory of all Mi-17 parts now owned by the military, plus better training for the contracting official involved in the purchases. Inspectors also want the Army to find out how much of the misspent money it might be able to get back.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Phillip Swarts is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times, covering fiscal waste, fraud and political ethics. He is a graduate of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University and previously worked as an investigative reporter for the Washington Guardian. Phillip can be reached at email@example.com.
- Christians flee Mosul after ISIL threat: Convert to Islam or die
- Ex-Gitmo detainee Moazzam Begg charged with terrorism
- Chicago shooting spree: 22 people shot in 12 hours
- U.S. bests Iran to advance to the Gold Medal match at the FIVB World League Finals
- Bill Maher blames Hamas for Gaza violence: 'Do you really expect the Israelis not to retaliate?'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Pentagon running out of time to find mass of missing weapons in Afghanistan
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring 'God's Rescue Squad'
- WEST: Those who would rather join the jihadi army than their own nation's army
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq