- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
LAMBRO: Obama’s sequestration alarmism was dead wrong
‘Sky is falling’ job-loss forecast didn’t materialize
President Obama’s bogus promises, predictions and claims are legendary, but perhaps you’ve forgotten his “sky is falling” forecast about the $85 billion budget sequestration.
Last February, as Congress‘ automatic budget cuts began chipping away at the government’s out-of-control spending levels, Mr. Obama went hyperbolic. The spending cuts would deal a “huge blow … to our economy as a whole” and “all our economic progress could be at risk.”
In a string of speeches, the president played his fear card again. Air-traffic control operations were being put at risk. Cancer research projects would be halted. Your food safety was in jeopardy.
The White House was put on a full, scare-them-to-death alert to frighten Americans into thinking the sequestration cuts would doom economic growth and destroy the very foundations of our economy.
Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid went on the Senate floor to claim, “We have learned that the sequestration has cut 1.6 million jobs.” The Washington Post’s combination fact-checker and lie-detector, Glenn Kessler, awarded Mr. Reid his highest score for dishonesty: four Pinocchios.
It turned out that Mr. Obama’s economic fear rhetoric was no more truthful than when he promised Americans, “If you like your health insurance plan, you can keep it.”
The sequestration cuts didn’t hurt our economy; they helped it. Wiser voices who said the budget reductions would be a net plus for the economy were, of course, right.
As the sequestration was doing its work throughout 2013, budget watchers and economic analysts pointed out that the number of jobs being created didn’t decline; it grew. It was nowhere near the number needed to bring unemployment down to normal levels, but it did move in the opposite direction from what Mr. Obama and his fellow fear mongers were predicting.
“The economy added about 1 million new jobs over the period during which the sequester was supposed to cost 750,000 jobs (or 1.6 million, if you believed Harry Reid),” Tom Giovanetti, economic analyst at the Institute for Policy Innovation, wrote late last year.
“In fact, Nobel Prize-winning economist Gary Becker observed that private-sector job growth has more than compensated for public-sector job losses, which means the effort that formally went toward hobbling the private sector is now being productively put to work in the private sector,” Mr. Giovanetti added.
As sequestration worked its will over the course of the past year, the trillion-dollar budget deficit fell to $650 billion. That was a result in part of the spending reductions, but also to slightly better economic growth.
By the second quarter of 2013, the economy grew at 1.7 percent, when economic forecasters were predicting slower growth in the 1 percent range. By the third quarter, the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) rose by 3.6 percent, according to the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Much of that growth was a result of inventory accumulation that many forecasters said would not hold up in the fourth quarter. Nevertheless, the GDP was a far cry from Mr. Obama’s hysterical and obviously erroneous warnings that the nightly network news media swallowed hook, line and sinker.
The fact that the administration would try to make such an issue over just $85 billion in budget cuts — divided equally between defense and non-defense appropriated funding — was preposterous on its face. You don’t have to be a math genius to understand that $85 billion is a very small percentage out of a $3.5 trillion budget in a nearly $17 trillion economy.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Paul takes veiled shot at Cruz, says GOP must focus on growth
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- VIDEO: Emily Miller on Fox Business "The Independents" special "The Gun Show"
- Obama engages in Ukraine diplomacy from Fla. resort as Russia digs in
- Stolen European passports on Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777
- Gates: Obama strategy won't stop Putin
- CPAC 2014 straw poll results
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults