- Arkansas voter ID law struck down by state judge
- FDA proposes ban on e-cigarette sales to minors
- Bad omen? Italian man crushed to death by John Paul II crucifix
- Company stopped from accepting abortion waste
- Girl surprises Michelle Obama with unemployed dad’s resume
- ‘Harry Potter’ religion class seeks to enlighten students on ‘God, sin, and theodicy’
- ‘Optionally piloted’ Black Hawk helicopter clears tests; future missions to go ‘fully unmanned’
- Vice News reporter kidnapped in Ukraine is freed after being beaten, blindfolded
- FCC’s new ‘net neutrality’ proposal sparks outrage among consumer advocates
- Families of ferry’s lost confront South Korean officials
LAMBRO: Obama’s sequestration alarmism was dead wrong
‘Sky is falling’ job-loss forecast didn’t materialize
President Obama’s bogus promises, predictions and claims are legendary, but perhaps you’ve forgotten his “sky is falling” forecast about the $85 billion budget sequestration.
Last February, as Congress’ automatic budget cuts began chipping away at the government’s out-of-control spending levels, Mr. Obama went hyperbolic. The spending cuts would deal a “huge blow … to our economy as a whole” and “all our economic progress could be at risk.”
In a string of speeches, the president played his fear card again. Air-traffic control operations were being put at risk. Cancer research projects would be halted. Your food safety was in jeopardy.
The White House was put on a full, scare-them-to-death alert to frighten Americans into thinking the sequestration cuts would doom economic growth and destroy the very foundations of our economy.
Alan B. Krueger, who was chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers at the time, said sequestration would slash 750,000 jobs by year’s end.
Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid went on the Senate floor to claim, “We have learned that the sequestration has cut 1.6 million jobs.” The Washington Post’s combination fact-checker and lie-detector, Glenn Kessler, awarded Mr. Reid his highest score for dishonesty: four Pinocchios.
It turned out that Mr. Obama’s economic fear rhetoric was no more truthful than when he promised Americans, “If you like your health insurance plan, you can keep it.”
The sequestration cuts didn’t hurt our economy; they helped it. Wiser voices who said the budget reductions would be a net plus for the economy were, of course, right.
As the sequestration was doing its work throughout 2013, budget watchers and economic analysts pointed out that the number of jobs being created didn’t decline; it grew. It was nowhere near the number needed to bring unemployment down to normal levels, but it did move in the opposite direction from what Mr. Obama and his fellow fear mongers were predicting.
“The economy added about 1 million new jobs over the period during which the sequester was supposed to cost 750,000 jobs (or 1.6 million, if you believed Harry Reid),” Tom Giovanetti, economic analyst at the Institute for Policy Innovation, wrote late last year.
“In fact, Nobel Prize-winning economist Gary Becker observed that private-sector job growth has more than compensated for public-sector job losses, which means the effort that formally went toward hobbling the private sector is now being productively put to work in the private sector,” Mr. Giovanetti added.
As sequestration worked its will over the course of the past year, the trillion-dollar budget deficit fell to $650 billion. That was a result in part of the spending reductions, but also to slightly better economic growth.
By the second quarter of 2013, the economy grew at 1.7 percent, when economic forecasters were predicting slower growth in the 1 percent range. By the third quarter, the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) rose by 3.6 percent, according to the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Much of that growth was a result of inventory accumulation that many forecasters said would not hold up in the fourth quarter. Nevertheless, the GDP was a far cry from Mr. Obama’s hysterical and obviously erroneous warnings that the nightly network news media swallowed hook, line and sinker.
The fact that the administration would try to make such an issue over just $85 billion in budget cuts — divided equally between defense and non-defense appropriated funding — was preposterous on its face. You don’t have to be a math genius to understand that $85 billion is a very small percentage out of a $3.5 trillion budget in a nearly $17 trillion economy.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Only IRS employees could expect rewards for failing to pay their taxes
Get Breaking Alerts
- Holder cancels appearance in OKC amid angry protests
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- In its hunt for Senate, Republican candidates campaign against Harry Reid
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Obamacare class-action suit opens a new legal front
- Sold out: Ukraine's leadership swapped best military weapons for cash
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- Gun control supporters send message to NRA
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- Nevada rancher's racial remarks cost him range of support
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Don't punish unborn for parents' sins
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Fraud minimal in house-call health care
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Palestinian Authority on 'jihad-care'?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Recalling foresight of Reagan, Thatcher on SDI
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: A double standard on pejoratives?