- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
Truth Watch: Obama a bit too rosy with his State of the Union math
President Obama promised a touch of optimism for his fifth State of the Union address, but Tuesday night he was a bit too positive about his record of accomplishment.
Right from his opening line, the president cherry-picked the rosiest of statistics that didn’t always reflect the reality of his record even as the economy finally creaks back to life.
For instance, the president hailed the “8 million new jobs our businesses have created over the past four years.” But the president has been in office for five years and the figure he used was a gross number that ignores the effect of continued job erosion, especially from the early part of his presidency.
In fact, the net gain of jobs on Mr. Obama’s watch is 3.25 million, according to the website FactCheck.org, and the number of Americans who are jobless still stands above 10 million, including 3.9 million who have been out of work for at least 27 weeks, known as the long-term unemployed.
Many more Americans are no longer seeking jobs and have fallen from the count. CNNMoney recently reported that only 62.8 percent of the adult population is participating in the labor market, the lowest percentage since 1978 when Jimmy Carter was president.
The president gave a more accurate description of the economic troubles on Main Street when he acknowledged that “average wages have barely budged” on his watch.
From 2008 to 2012, the average wage for workers rose from 1 percent to 1.7 percent when adjusted for inflation, according to the fact-checking website PolitiFact.
The president also made a proposal he portrayed as dramatic, using his executive powers to raise the minimum wage for federal contractors from $7.25 to $10.10 an hour. But the fact is the proposal won’t affect many workers.
Most employees of federal contractors already earn more than $10.10. About 10 percent of those workers, roughly 200,000, might be covered by the higher minimum wage. But there are several wrinkles, according to The Associated Press. The increase would not take effect until 2015 at the earliest, and it wouldn’t apply to existing federal contracts, only new ones. Renewed contracts also will be exempt from Obama’s order unless other terms of the agreement change, such as the type of work or number of employees needed.
Obama also said he will press Congress to raise the federal minimum wage overall. He tried that last year, seeking a $9 minimum, but Congress didn’t act.
The president also hailed the growth of oil and natural gas development on his watch, but the government can’t take much credit for that growth, either.
Much of that growth has occurred on private lands, not federal lands, and the drilling industry has complained the administration has been slow to embrace the opportunities unleashed by the fracking revolution because it has been so focused on funding the growth of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind.
Mr. Obama also attracted the fact-checkers’ notice with his promise to “protect” more than 3 million transportation and waterways works projects by slashing bureaucracy and streamlining the permitting process.
Joshua Schank, president of the Eno Center for Transportation, told AP that bureaucratic red tape was far less of a problem than the lack of budget dollars to fund projects. The federal Highway Trust Fund is set to run out of money this summer, and Mr. Obama’s proposal to raise taxes of U.S. corporate overseas operations as a way to finance infrastructure programs has made little headway on Capitol Hill.
“The reason most of these projects are delayed is they don’t have enough money,” said Mr. Schank. “So it’s great that you are expediting the review process, but the review process isn’t the problem.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Phillip Swarts is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times, covering fiscal waste, fraud and political ethics. He is a graduate of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University and previously worked as an investigative reporter for the Washington Guardian. Phillip can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- IG questions EPA stimulus spending on train refurbishing in California
- EPA officials don't know if $9 million stimulus grant did any good
- VA employee sentenced for trading vets' info for crack cocaine
- FCC targets black conservative in TV station fight
- CPAC 2014: Conservatives say Ukraine crisis fueled by Obama weakness, 'diplomatic babble'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- House Democrats trying to force unemployment insurance vote
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Hillary Clinton campaign received funds from Jeffrey Thompson
- FCC targets black conservative in TV station fight
- Redskins bypass big splash - for now - as free agency period begins
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- Sharyl Attkisson resigns from CBS after months of talks
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again