- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
- U.N. warns of Muslim ‘cleansing’ in Central African Republic
- Senate blocks change to military sex assault cases
- Drug mix may have cured child born with HIV, doctors say
DARLING: Wendy Davis spurs a welcome abortion debate in Texas
Democrat’s candidacy for governor brings fresh scrutiny to the procedure
I’m a conservative. I’m pro-life. I’m a Southern Baptist. I don’t live in Texas.
So you’d think that I’d be upset about the gubernatorial candidacy of Wendy Davis, the famous, pink-wearing state senator from the Lone Star State.
After all, she’s extremely liberal, she’s massaged parts of her personal biography, and she’s made clumsy attacks on her opponent, the wheelchair-bound attorney general of Texas, Greg Abbott. This is not exactly the type of candidate whose candidacy I applaud.
Still, I’m glad Ms. Davis is running for governor of Texas. Why? Because, thanks to her 11-hour filibuster on the floor of the Texas Senate last year and her subsequent coronation as a left-wing heroine, America is about to have a national conversation about the gruesome, inhumane, un-American procedure she fought so valiantly to keep legal and restriction-free.
Filibusters are an exercise in American activism. As a child, I remember the inspiration I felt while watching the grainy, black-and-white images of Jimmy Stewart as a naive senator in “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.”
Recently, we’ve seen the rise of the filibuster as a means of driving the conversation. Last year, Sens. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz tested their stamina (and our patience) while championing causes they believe in. It’s a tool our constitutional government gives to the minority party.
I’m thankful for the filibuster. Anyone who has the fortitude to stand for that long in one place deserves some credit. No lesser reward should go to the one who listens all those hours, enduring endless political talking points and, at the end of most, blathering nonsense.
Let’s not be confused, though, about what the #standwithwendy groundswell represents. Ms. Davis stood for 11 hours and is running for governor of our second-most populous state to protect the right to kill babies in the womb more than 20 weeks old.
This is well after a baby’s heart begins to beat; the organs, nerves and cells are fully functioning; sexual organs begin to form; and the baby may begin to feel pain.
Let that sink in for a minute. This is the catalyst for the pink sneakers and the Twitter love from feminists and liberals. The candidacy of this state senator from Fort Worth is built on the notion that it’s good to end the life of babies even after the fifth month of pregnancy.
The bill, up for debate in the Texas Legislature, later passed and signed into law, would outlaw abortions after 20 weeks, enforce health guidelines on women’s clinics and would require an abortion-performing doctor to have admitting privileges to a nearby hospital.
This was not some draconian measure, but legislation keeping up with public opinion, which by an overwhelming majority favors a ban on abortion after 20 weeks. What’s more, it protects women’s health by ensuring that abortion providers are held up to the same standards as other health care providers.
It also allows a baby who survives an abortion to have a chance at life by ensuring a doctor can quickly access the services of a hospital.
Ms. Davis‘ filibuster might have been a stand for principle, but was it courageous? Have we made such an idol of personal autonomy that we’re willing to sacrifice the preciousness of human life in the womb, even human life older than five months?
I’m old enough to remember when liberal Democrats acknowledged abortion as a “tragic choice” and something to keep “safe, legal and rare.”
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Get Breaking Alerts
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- IRS to turn over Lerner emails in tea party targeting probe
- DELAY: A revolution for the Constitution
- BRUCE: Obama's bizarre immigration rules
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- PRUDEN: Likening Putin to Hitler on Ukraine shows Hillary's shaky grasp of history
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Border Patrol policy still permits agents to shoot at rock-throwers
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama's flawed Mideast 'peace' plan
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Foreign policy would distract Obama from social hour
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Hit Putin where it hurts over Ukraine